"Listen to any musical phrase or rhythm, and grasp it as a whole, and you thereupon have present in you the image, so to speak, of the divine knowledge of the temporal order"
About this Quote
A single bar of music becomes Royce's stealth argument for how minds can touch eternity without leaving time. He’s not romanticizing melody; he’s using it as a working model for a philosophical problem that preoccupied late-19th-century idealists: how can finite, moment-by-moment consciousness ever know an ordered whole?
The trick is the phrase "grasp it as a whole". A musical rhythm only exists by vanishing: each note is gone the instant it’s heard. Yet we don’t experience it as a pile of disappeared sounds. We hold the beginning while the middle arrives and the end anticipates itself. That ordinary cognitive feat - retention and expectation braided into a single perception - lets Royce smuggle in his bigger claim: the mind can form an image of "the temporal order" not as a sequence of isolated now-points but as a coherent structure.
Calling that image "so to speak" and "divine" is careful stagecraft. Royce signals he’s not claiming literal omniscience; he’s pointing to an analogy. "Divine knowledge" stands in for a perspective that sees the whole timeline at once, the way a composer, unlike a listener, knows the entire piece. When you apprehend a musical phrase as a unit, you momentarily approximate that composer-like vantage.
Context matters: Royce, an American absolute idealist writing in an era newly obsessed with psychology, time-consciousness, and scientific accounts of mind, is insisting that meaning requires a larger-than-the-moment viewpoint. Music becomes evidence that our experience already depends on a kind of built-in transcendence - a local, humane version of the God’s-eye view his metaphysics wants to defend.
The trick is the phrase "grasp it as a whole". A musical rhythm only exists by vanishing: each note is gone the instant it’s heard. Yet we don’t experience it as a pile of disappeared sounds. We hold the beginning while the middle arrives and the end anticipates itself. That ordinary cognitive feat - retention and expectation braided into a single perception - lets Royce smuggle in his bigger claim: the mind can form an image of "the temporal order" not as a sequence of isolated now-points but as a coherent structure.
Calling that image "so to speak" and "divine" is careful stagecraft. Royce signals he’s not claiming literal omniscience; he’s pointing to an analogy. "Divine knowledge" stands in for a perspective that sees the whole timeline at once, the way a composer, unlike a listener, knows the entire piece. When you apprehend a musical phrase as a unit, you momentarily approximate that composer-like vantage.
Context matters: Royce, an American absolute idealist writing in an era newly obsessed with psychology, time-consciousness, and scientific accounts of mind, is insisting that meaning requires a larger-than-the-moment viewpoint. Music becomes evidence that our experience already depends on a kind of built-in transcendence - a local, humane version of the God’s-eye view his metaphysics wants to defend.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Josiah
Add to List




