"Look, it's a mainstream animated movie, and how often are those considered thought provoking? It's meant to be a great time at the theater, but it's also designed to work on more than one level"
About this Quote
Brad Bird is doing two things at once: defending animation from the patronizing assumption that “mainstream” means “mindless,” and politely warning his audience not to confuse fun with frivolity. The opening “Look” has the texture of a hallway argument, the kind a filmmaker has after hearing yet another compliment that doubles as a dismissal: great for kids, sure, but does it matter? Bird answers by conceding the rules of the marketplace (“It’s meant to be a great time at the theater”) while smuggling in an older, tougher artistic ambition (“more than one level”).
The subtext is strategic: he knows animation is often treated like cultural training wheels, so he frames complexity as design, not accident. Thought-provoking isn’t a lucky byproduct; it’s built into the machine. That word “designed” matters. It suggests craft, intent, and audience respect. You can laugh, gasp, eat popcorn, and still leave with a lingering ethical itch. Bird’s films (The Incredibles, Ratatouille) thrive on that dual-channel storytelling: kinetic spectacle on the surface, then a second current about conformity, excellence, family, labor, and the costs of being exceptional.
Contextually, Bird is pushing back against an era when animation, especially from big studios, was boxed into “family entertainment” as a genre-and-audience prison. His statement argues for a broader definition of seriousness: not solemnity, but layered clarity. The real flex is insisting that mass appeal and intelligence aren’t rivals. They’re a choreography.
The subtext is strategic: he knows animation is often treated like cultural training wheels, so he frames complexity as design, not accident. Thought-provoking isn’t a lucky byproduct; it’s built into the machine. That word “designed” matters. It suggests craft, intent, and audience respect. You can laugh, gasp, eat popcorn, and still leave with a lingering ethical itch. Bird’s films (The Incredibles, Ratatouille) thrive on that dual-channel storytelling: kinetic spectacle on the surface, then a second current about conformity, excellence, family, labor, and the costs of being exceptional.
Contextually, Bird is pushing back against an era when animation, especially from big studios, was boxed into “family entertainment” as a genre-and-audience prison. His statement argues for a broader definition of seriousness: not solemnity, but layered clarity. The real flex is insisting that mass appeal and intelligence aren’t rivals. They’re a choreography.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Brad
Add to List


