"Look, we know we screwed up when we were in the majority. We fell in love with power. We spent way too much money - especially on earmarks. There was too much corruption when we ran this place. We were guilty. And that's why we lost"
About this Quote
Eric Cantor offers a blunt confession and a strategy. By admitting that a Republican majority lost discipline, gorged on earmarks, and succumbed to corruption, he names the vices that turned a reform brand into a ruling party susceptible to the comforts of incumbency. The language is deliberately plain and collective: we screwed up, we fell in love with power, we were guilty. That pronoun we spreads responsibility across the party and frames the loss of power as a self-inflicted wound rather than an injustice or a mere swing of the political pendulum.
The context is the GOP reckoning after the 2006 midterms, when Democrats retook Congress amid frustration over spending, scandals tied to figures like Jack Abramoff and Duke Cunningham, and the symbolic excess of earmarks such as the Bridge to Nowhere. Under unified Republican government in the early 2000s, deficits swelled and big-ticket initiatives like Medicare Part D departed from small-government rhetoric. Cantor, then a rising Republican leader, channels the Tea Party moment that soon followed: a pledge to restore fiscal restraint and clean up practices that had come to epitomize Washington self-dealing.
Confession performs two political tasks. It preempts critics by owning the charge, and it narrows the explanation for defeat to behavior rather than ideology. The party did not lose, in this reading, because its core principles were wrong; it lost because it abandoned them and indulged in the very excess it once promised to check. That framing keeps the brand intact while promising reform through bans on earmarks, stricter ethics, and renewed spending discipline.
There is also a cautionary note about the corrupting nature of power. The phrase fell in love with power is a moral diagnosis, not just a tactical one. It warns that majorities fail when they treat victory as entitlement rather than a responsibility, and it sets a standard that Cantor and his allies used to argue for a leaner, more accountable Republican majority in the years leading up to the 2010 wave.
The context is the GOP reckoning after the 2006 midterms, when Democrats retook Congress amid frustration over spending, scandals tied to figures like Jack Abramoff and Duke Cunningham, and the symbolic excess of earmarks such as the Bridge to Nowhere. Under unified Republican government in the early 2000s, deficits swelled and big-ticket initiatives like Medicare Part D departed from small-government rhetoric. Cantor, then a rising Republican leader, channels the Tea Party moment that soon followed: a pledge to restore fiscal restraint and clean up practices that had come to epitomize Washington self-dealing.
Confession performs two political tasks. It preempts critics by owning the charge, and it narrows the explanation for defeat to behavior rather than ideology. The party did not lose, in this reading, because its core principles were wrong; it lost because it abandoned them and indulged in the very excess it once promised to check. That framing keeps the brand intact while promising reform through bans on earmarks, stricter ethics, and renewed spending discipline.
There is also a cautionary note about the corrupting nature of power. The phrase fell in love with power is a moral diagnosis, not just a tactical one. It warns that majorities fail when they treat victory as entitlement rather than a responsibility, and it sets a standard that Cantor and his allies used to argue for a leaner, more accountable Republican majority in the years leading up to the 2010 wave.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Eric
Add to List
