"Lord Chancellor, did I deliver the speech well? I am glad of that, for there was nothing in it"
About this Quote
The intent reads as private candor aimed at the Lord Chancellor, a senior legal officer who would understand that governance often lives in ambiguity. Delivered as a post-speech aside, it suggests a monarch aware that rhetoric can be a minefield: say too much and you create factions; say too little and you preserve room to maneuver. That’s not just laziness; it’s risk management masquerading as humility.
Context sharpens the irony. George III ruled in an era of mounting parliamentary power, press scrutiny, and political volatility across the Atlantic and Europe. A monarch in that climate could not freely improvise policy from a throne. The subtext is a quiet admission that the crown’s voice is increasingly ceremonial - and that ceremony itself is a tool. He’s pleased not because he inspired, but because he escaped.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
III, George. (n.d.). Lord Chancellor, did I deliver the speech well? I am glad of that, for there was nothing in it. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/lord-chancellor-did-i-deliver-the-speech-well-i-17984/
Chicago Style
III, George. "Lord Chancellor, did I deliver the speech well? I am glad of that, for there was nothing in it." FixQuotes. Accessed February 2, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/lord-chancellor-did-i-deliver-the-speech-well-i-17984/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Lord Chancellor, did I deliver the speech well? I am glad of that, for there was nothing in it." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/lord-chancellor-did-i-deliver-the-speech-well-i-17984/. Accessed 2 Feb. 2026.



