"Man's ultimate concern must be expressed symbolically, because symbolic language alone is able to express the ultimate"
About this Quote
Tillich is quietly detonating a modern fantasy: that the most important things in human life can be neatly packaged as facts. His line insists that when we talk about what finally claims us - God, meaning, death, justice, love, the thing we would bet our life on - we are already outside the reach of literal description. The "ultimate" is not just bigger than ordinary concerns; it is categorically different, the kind of reality that breaks the measuring tools we use for ordinary reality. So we reach for symbols: not as decorative poetry, but as the only medium that can carry the weight.
The subtext is a defense of religion after the credibility crisis of the early 20th century, when science, historical criticism, and world war made traditional God-talk sound either naive or dangerous. Tillich, writing in the shadow of totalitarianism and exile, doesn't retreat into fundamentalism. He reframes faith as depth. Symbolic language becomes a disciplined honesty: an admission that literal statements about the divine tend to turn God into an object, a manageable thing among things - which, for Tillich, is idolatry.
The sentence also smuggles in a cultural critique. Modernity prizes "clear communication", but Tillich suggests clarity can be a form of evasion when it comes to ultimate commitments. Symbols don't just point; they participate, they open up levels of experience we can't access with straightforward propositions. He's not asking for vagueness. He's arguing for a language adequate to stakes that are total.
The subtext is a defense of religion after the credibility crisis of the early 20th century, when science, historical criticism, and world war made traditional God-talk sound either naive or dangerous. Tillich, writing in the shadow of totalitarianism and exile, doesn't retreat into fundamentalism. He reframes faith as depth. Symbolic language becomes a disciplined honesty: an admission that literal statements about the divine tend to turn God into an object, a manageable thing among things - which, for Tillich, is idolatry.
The sentence also smuggles in a cultural critique. Modernity prizes "clear communication", but Tillich suggests clarity can be a form of evasion when it comes to ultimate commitments. Symbols don't just point; they participate, they open up levels of experience we can't access with straightforward propositions. He's not asking for vagueness. He's arguing for a language adequate to stakes that are total.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List









