"Many migrants awaiting asylum hearings in the U.S. never show up for their court dates. And the longer they stay in the U.S., the more sympathy they draw in the media and from many compassionate Americans"
About this Quote
Kirk’s line is engineered to do two things at once: delegitimize asylum seekers and preemptively discredit the institutions that might humanize them. The opening claim about migrants “never” showing up reads like a blunt fact, but its real work is rhetorical. It frames missed hearings not as a bureaucratic failure (confusing notices, lack of counsel, address changes, language barriers) but as character evidence: they’re gaming the system. That’s a familiar move in immigration politics - shift the story from administration to morality.
The second sentence is the tell. “The longer they stay” turns time into strategy, as if human lives and legal limbo are simply a PR countdown. Sympathy becomes something “drawn” from the media and “compassionate Americans,” a phrasing that treats empathy like a resource being extracted, not an earned response to visible suffering. It’s a subtle downgrade of compassion itself: noble in private, naive in public.
Subtextually, the quote lays a trap for audiences who might feel torn. It reassures skeptics that their discomfort with emotional coverage is rational, because the emotions are supposedly being manipulated. It also pressures moderates: if you respond to a family’s story, you’re not humane - you’re being played.
Context matters: this is the right’s long-running counternarrative to viral images of border hardship. When policy arguments are losing, attack the narrators, question the tears, and recast delay (often produced by backlogged courts) as a deliberate con.
The second sentence is the tell. “The longer they stay” turns time into strategy, as if human lives and legal limbo are simply a PR countdown. Sympathy becomes something “drawn” from the media and “compassionate Americans,” a phrasing that treats empathy like a resource being extracted, not an earned response to visible suffering. It’s a subtle downgrade of compassion itself: noble in private, naive in public.
Subtextually, the quote lays a trap for audiences who might feel torn. It reassures skeptics that their discomfort with emotional coverage is rational, because the emotions are supposedly being manipulated. It also pressures moderates: if you respond to a family’s story, you’re not humane - you’re being played.
Context matters: this is the right’s long-running counternarrative to viral images of border hardship. When policy arguments are losing, attack the narrators, question the tears, and recast delay (often produced by backlogged courts) as a deliberate con.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Charlie
Add to List





