"Many people lock a part of themselves away. It's a bit sacred"
About this Quote
Tori Amos frames secrecy not as dysfunction but as devotion. “Many people lock a part of themselves away” lands with the blunt familiarity of confession: everyone’s got a room in the house they don’t give tours of. The turn comes with “It’s a bit sacred,” which flips the usual self-help logic that all concealment is shame. In her wording, the hidden self isn’t necessarily trauma to be excavated; it can be a private altar, protected because exposure cheapens it.
That’s a very Amos move, rooted in an artist who’s spent a career turning interior life into sound while refusing to flatten it into simple catharsis. She’s written about bodily autonomy, religious control, and the politics of being listened to; “sacred” carries the echo of church language, but it’s repurposed. The sanctity here isn’t institutional. It’s self-governed. Locking something away becomes an act of boundary-setting, especially for people whose bodies, stories, or desires are routinely treated as public property.
The subtext is a quiet rebuttal to the culture of compulsory disclosure: therapy-speak on social media, confessional branding, the idea that authenticity requires full access. Amos suggests the opposite: authenticity can include guardedness. Some parts of us aren’t secrets because they’re wrong; they’re secrets because they’re precious, still forming, or too easily misread. Calling that space “sacred” legitimizes privacy as a form of care, not avoidance.
That’s a very Amos move, rooted in an artist who’s spent a career turning interior life into sound while refusing to flatten it into simple catharsis. She’s written about bodily autonomy, religious control, and the politics of being listened to; “sacred” carries the echo of church language, but it’s repurposed. The sanctity here isn’t institutional. It’s self-governed. Locking something away becomes an act of boundary-setting, especially for people whose bodies, stories, or desires are routinely treated as public property.
The subtext is a quiet rebuttal to the culture of compulsory disclosure: therapy-speak on social media, confessional branding, the idea that authenticity requires full access. Amos suggests the opposite: authenticity can include guardedness. Some parts of us aren’t secrets because they’re wrong; they’re secrets because they’re precious, still forming, or too easily misread. Calling that space “sacred” legitimizes privacy as a form of care, not avoidance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tori
Add to List







