"Many times the players get in there and it's just about as well as they could have done, and other times they get in there and they favorites and they don't win"
About this Quote
Lendl’s charm here is that he’s accidentally diagnosing elite sports with the plainest possible blunt instrument: sometimes performance is the ceiling, sometimes expectation is the trap. The sentence stumbles, doubles back, shrugs at its own grammar - and that’s the point. It sounds like a man who has spent too many hours watching tennis turn logic into noise. You can hear the locker-room fatalism: you can play about as well as you’re capable of, and still lose; you can be the favorite, and the label can dissolve the match plan.
The intent isn’t poetry, it’s correction. Lendl is pushing against the lazy moral story that the better player always wins, or that a loss automatically indicates some failure of effort. He’s separating two realities athletes live with: execution and outcome. One is controllable; the other is a negotiation with matchups, surfaces, nerves, weather, and a rival’s day. When he notes the favorite who doesn’t win, he’s also poking at the media’s need for tidy hierarchies, as if ranking systems and pre-match narratives can pre-author the scoreline.
Context matters because Lendl came up in an era when tennis was becoming a global TV product: branding, seeding, pressure, the whole machinery of “should.” His quote resists that machinery. It treats variance as normal, not scandalous. The subtext is almost therapeutic: if you want to survive at the top, you learn to live with the uncomfortable truth that doing everything right doesn’t guarantee anything - and that being expected to win can be its own kind of opponent.
The intent isn’t poetry, it’s correction. Lendl is pushing against the lazy moral story that the better player always wins, or that a loss automatically indicates some failure of effort. He’s separating two realities athletes live with: execution and outcome. One is controllable; the other is a negotiation with matchups, surfaces, nerves, weather, and a rival’s day. When he notes the favorite who doesn’t win, he’s also poking at the media’s need for tidy hierarchies, as if ranking systems and pre-match narratives can pre-author the scoreline.
Context matters because Lendl came up in an era when tennis was becoming a global TV product: branding, seeding, pressure, the whole machinery of “should.” His quote resists that machinery. It treats variance as normal, not scandalous. The subtext is almost therapeutic: if you want to survive at the top, you learn to live with the uncomfortable truth that doing everything right doesn’t guarantee anything - and that being expected to win can be its own kind of opponent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ivan
Add to List





