"March 11, 2004, now occupies a place in the history of infamy"
About this Quote
Aznar reaches for Roosevelt on purpose. By echoing "a date which will live in infamy", he tries to staple March 11, 2004 to the same moral shelf as Pearl Harbor: not merely tragic, but civilization-shaking, a turning point that demands unity and resolve. The wording is spare and judicial; "occupies a place" sounds like history itself is doing the filing, not a politician making a claim. That impersonality is the trick. It laundered emotion through authority, transforming grief into a verdict.
The context makes the line hotter. The Madrid train bombings killed 191 people and wounded thousands just days before Spain's national election. Aznar's government initially pushed the idea that ETA, the Basque separatist group, was responsible, even as evidence pointed toward Islamist militants linked to al-Qaeda. In that atmosphere, "infamy" operates as a rhetorical accelerant: it directs outrage outward, and it narrows the range of acceptable questions. If the nation is under historic attack, dissent starts to look like disloyalty; calls for patience start to feel like weakness.
The subtext is about control of the narrative clock. Naming the day as "infamy" freezes it into a clean, commemorative shape before the messy politics of attribution can catch up. It is also a bid to align Spain with the post-9/11 global frame, where terrorism is not just a crime but a war category. The line works because it promises moral clarity in a moment designed to produce panic, then asks the public to accept the government's version of that clarity.
The context makes the line hotter. The Madrid train bombings killed 191 people and wounded thousands just days before Spain's national election. Aznar's government initially pushed the idea that ETA, the Basque separatist group, was responsible, even as evidence pointed toward Islamist militants linked to al-Qaeda. In that atmosphere, "infamy" operates as a rhetorical accelerant: it directs outrage outward, and it narrows the range of acceptable questions. If the nation is under historic attack, dissent starts to look like disloyalty; calls for patience start to feel like weakness.
The subtext is about control of the narrative clock. Naming the day as "infamy" freezes it into a clean, commemorative shape before the messy politics of attribution can catch up. It is also a bid to align Spain with the post-9/11 global frame, where terrorism is not just a crime but a war category. The line works because it promises moral clarity in a moment designed to produce panic, then asks the public to accept the government's version of that clarity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jose
Add to List
