"Marriage brings one into fatal connection with custom and tradition, and traditions and customs are like the wind and weather, altogether incalculable"
About this Quote
Kierkegaard frames marriage not as romance but as risk: a “fatal connection” to forces you don’t control. “Fatal” is doing double duty here. It’s not simply “serious,” it’s fated and potentially deadly to the self you’re trying to become. In Kierkegaard’s world, the great human task is to live as a singular individual before God, not as a well-adjusted citizen. Marriage, for all its comforts, threatens to outsource that task to the social script.
The target isn’t love; it’s custom. He treats “tradition” and “custom” like weather: ambient, coercive, and unpredictably shifting. That’s a sly, almost modern insight. People imagine norms as stable guardrails; Kierkegaard insists they’re capricious, blown by fashion, family expectations, church politics, economic necessity. You don’t marry only a person. You marry their village. And the village changes its mind.
Subtextually, he’s also indicting the bourgeois fantasy that marriage resolves existential anxiety. In 19th-century Denmark, marriage was a moral credential and social infrastructure. Kierkegaard, famously breaking off his engagement to Regine Olsen, knew the cost of refusing that infrastructure: scandal, loneliness, misreading. The line reads like self-justification, but it’s sharper than a personal alibi. It’s an argument that the “ethical” life of duty can become a camouflage for conformity, and that what looks like commitment can quietly become surrender to whatever the cultural climate demands next.
The target isn’t love; it’s custom. He treats “tradition” and “custom” like weather: ambient, coercive, and unpredictably shifting. That’s a sly, almost modern insight. People imagine norms as stable guardrails; Kierkegaard insists they’re capricious, blown by fashion, family expectations, church politics, economic necessity. You don’t marry only a person. You marry their village. And the village changes its mind.
Subtextually, he’s also indicting the bourgeois fantasy that marriage resolves existential anxiety. In 19th-century Denmark, marriage was a moral credential and social infrastructure. Kierkegaard, famously breaking off his engagement to Regine Olsen, knew the cost of refusing that infrastructure: scandal, loneliness, misreading. The line reads like self-justification, but it’s sharper than a personal alibi. It’s an argument that the “ethical” life of duty can become a camouflage for conformity, and that what looks like commitment can quietly become surrender to whatever the cultural climate demands next.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Søren
Add to List





