"Marriage cannot be severed from its cultural, religious and natural roots without weakening the good influence of society"

Jack Kingston’s statement draws attention to the intricate relationship between marriage and the foundational pillars of culture, religion, and what he refers to as “natural roots.” Embedded within this assertion is the idea that marriage is far more than merely a contractual or legal arrangement between individuals; it functions as a core institution that both shapes and is shaped by the values, traditions, and beliefs of society as a whole.

By referencing cultural roots, Kingston suggests that marriage embodies patterns of expectations, roles, and responsibilities, honed over generations to foster stability, cooperation, and continuity within communities. Traditions surrounding marriage have often promoted social cohesion, guided behavioral norms, and reinforced collective identities. Detaching marriage from these cultural foundations may therefore risk eroding the shared understandings that lend meaning and coherence to the social fabric.

Turning to religion, the idea is that religious traditions provide a moral and ethical framework, instilling in marriage a sense of sacredness, commitment, and permanence. For many, religious teachings have shaped the very definition and purpose of marriage, grounding it in stories, rituals, and commandments that transcend mere personal preference. The weakening of this connection can lead to the secularization or relativization of marriage, potentially reducing its perceived importance and durability in the eyes of society.

When Kingston refers to “natural roots,” he likely alludes to long-standing perceptions of marriage as tied to fundamental aspects of human nature, such as the bond between men and women and the raising of children. Under this viewpoint, marriage is not just a social construct, but an institution that aligns with human biology and natural law. Severing these roots may lead to redefinitions of marriage that, in his perspective, disrupt patterns crucial for societal well-being.

Ultimately, the underlying conviction is that these foundations, cultural, religious, and natural, serve as the anchor for marriage’s beneficial societal effects. Without them, he warns, the influence of the institution on society could be diminished, undermining the stability, morality, and continuity that marriage has historically promoted.