"Members will hear me say repeatedly words are important; deeds are a reality"
About this Quote
Corzine’s line is the kind of managerial moralism politicians reach for when they need to sound tough on themselves while quietly toughening expectations on everyone else. “Words are important” nods to the civic ritual: speeches, promises, floor statements, condolences. It flatters the institution - language matters here, we’re not just posturing. Then he snaps the leash: “deeds are a reality.” The grammar does work. “Words” get the softer adjective, “important,” while “deeds” get the harder noun, “reality,” as if action is not just preferable but ontologically superior. You can argue about rhetoric; you can’t argue with a bridge that wasn’t built.
The specific intent is disciplinary. “Members will hear me say repeatedly” frames it as a leadership mantra, a warning before the warning. It’s aimed at colleagues who want credit for intention, or at a public tired of the performative churn of politics. Corzine, a former Goldman Sachs CEO turned senator and governor, is particularly fluent in this register: results-based language that borrows corporate impatience with talk, while still needing talk to govern.
The subtext is also self-protective. By elevating “deeds,” he inoculates himself against the charge of empty rhetoric and shifts the conversation to measurable outputs - budgets passed, reforms implemented, crises managed. It’s a neat way to claim seriousness in a culture that increasingly treats politics as content. The irony, of course, is that “deeds” in government are rarely solo acts; they’re negotiated realities, built from the very words he’s trying to demote.
The specific intent is disciplinary. “Members will hear me say repeatedly” frames it as a leadership mantra, a warning before the warning. It’s aimed at colleagues who want credit for intention, or at a public tired of the performative churn of politics. Corzine, a former Goldman Sachs CEO turned senator and governor, is particularly fluent in this register: results-based language that borrows corporate impatience with talk, while still needing talk to govern.
The subtext is also self-protective. By elevating “deeds,” he inoculates himself against the charge of empty rhetoric and shifts the conversation to measurable outputs - budgets passed, reforms implemented, crises managed. It’s a neat way to claim seriousness in a culture that increasingly treats politics as content. The irony, of course, is that “deeds” in government are rarely solo acts; they’re negotiated realities, built from the very words he’s trying to demote.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jon
Add to List










