"Men are not hanged for stealing horses, but that horses may not be stolen"
About this Quote
The line lands like a cold legal joke: the state isn’t executing a thief because a horse is sacred, but because fear is useful. Savile strips punishment of its moral costume and shows it as a piece of public engineering. The hanging becomes less about justice than about signaling - a bloody billboard meant to manage behavior.
Its specific intent is to puncture the comforting idea that the law simply “matches” crime with deserved suffering. By choosing horse theft, Savile points to an offense that in 18th-century Britain was economically serious but not inherently murderous. Horses were capital: transport, labor, status. Yet the leap from property crime to the gallows exposes a system more invested in protecting property relations than in proportionate human judgment. The subtext is utilitarian and unsentimental: punishment is a tool, not a verdict on the soul.
Context sharpens the edge. Savile lived amid the “Bloody Code,” when England listed a startling range of property crimes as capital offenses, in a society anxious about urbanization, poverty, and social unrest. Public executions functioned as theater - not simply removing offenders, but teaching the crowd what the ruling order would do to those who threatened it. Savile’s phrasing makes the deterrent logic impossible to ignore, and by doing so, quietly asks whether deterrence justifies cruelty.
The rhetoric works because it flips cause and effect. We pretend hanging follows theft; Savile says hanging is performed for the future, not the past. In eight words, he turns retribution into risk management - and makes the reader hear the chill in that bargain.
Its specific intent is to puncture the comforting idea that the law simply “matches” crime with deserved suffering. By choosing horse theft, Savile points to an offense that in 18th-century Britain was economically serious but not inherently murderous. Horses were capital: transport, labor, status. Yet the leap from property crime to the gallows exposes a system more invested in protecting property relations than in proportionate human judgment. The subtext is utilitarian and unsentimental: punishment is a tool, not a verdict on the soul.
Context sharpens the edge. Savile lived amid the “Bloody Code,” when England listed a startling range of property crimes as capital offenses, in a society anxious about urbanization, poverty, and social unrest. Public executions functioned as theater - not simply removing offenders, but teaching the crowd what the ruling order would do to those who threatened it. Savile’s phrasing makes the deterrent logic impossible to ignore, and by doing so, quietly asks whether deterrence justifies cruelty.
The rhetoric works because it flips cause and effect. We pretend hanging follows theft; Savile says hanging is performed for the future, not the past. In eight words, he turns retribution into risk management - and makes the reader hear the chill in that bargain.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: The life and letters of Sir George Savile, Bart., first M... (Foxcroft, H. C. (Helen Charlotte), b...., 1898)IA: lifeandletterss01haligoog
Evidence: ded to no purpose men are not hanged for stealing horses but that horses may not be stolen Other candidates (2) The Life and Letters of Sir George Savile, Bart., First M... (Helen Charlotte Foxcroft, George Savi..., 1898) compilation95.0% Helen Charlotte Foxcroft, George Savile Marquis of Halifax. Some places have such a corrupting influence upon the ...... I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue (George Savile) compilation40.5% brigstocke thats hang on sorry this early in the game but thats more than six isnt it jac |
More Quotes by George
Add to List







