"Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another form of madness"
About this Quote
The subtext is Pascal’s long war with human self-satisfaction. As a 17th-century thinker watching the Scientific Revolution inflate confidence in method and proof, he refuses the era’s triumphal story about reason’s sovereignty. He’s not arguing that logic is useless; he’s arguing that logic can’t rescue us from the deeper problem: we are creatures who must live, choose, and die under conditions of uncertainty, desire, and fear. That pressure produces coping mechanisms - faith, vanity, ideology, distraction - and Pascal treats those mechanisms as structural, not optional.
Context matters: Pascal’s Christianity (especially the Jansenist severity of Port-Royal) frames “madness” as what happens when finite beings try to behave like infinite ones. We chase coherence and control we can’t actually possess, then call it wisdom. The quote works because it weaponizes paradox as diagnosis. It sounds like a joke with teeth, but it’s also a pastoral warning: if you can’t admit your own irrationality, you’ve already crossed into the most dangerous kind - the kind that mistakes itself for clarity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pascal, Blaise. (2026, January 18). Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another form of madness. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-are-so-necessarily-mad-that-not-to-be-mad-5066/
Chicago Style
Pascal, Blaise. "Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another form of madness." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-are-so-necessarily-mad-that-not-to-be-mad-5066/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another form of madness." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-are-so-necessarily-mad-that-not-to-be-mad-5066/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2026.










