"Men without jobs do not form families"
About this Quote
The specific intent is legislative as much as rhetorical. By tying joblessness to family formation, she reframes employment policy as family policy. That’s a strategic move in American political language, where “family values” often gets monopolized by culture-war symbolism. Norton drags it back to material conditions: payrolls, hiring discrimination, deindustrialization, incarceration, and the disappearance of stable work in Black and working-class communities. The subtext is an indictment of a society that demands “responsible fatherhood” while stripping away the very credential that confers adult legitimacy.
The line also exposes a gendered trap. It accepts, even if reluctantly, the stubborn norm that men are expected to be providers before they are allowed to be partners. That’s why it stings: it’s both descriptive and accusatory. The quote isn’t praising that norm; it’s pointing out how powerfully it governs behavior and how easily politicians exploit it to blame individuals instead of systems.
Context matters: late-20th-century urban policy debates, welfare reform, and post-industrial job loss made “family breakdown” a favorite scapegoat. Norton flips the script. If families aren’t forming, she implies, start by asking what happened to the jobs.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Norton, Eleanor Holmes. (2026, January 15). Men without jobs do not form families. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-without-jobs-do-not-form-families-155372/
Chicago Style
Norton, Eleanor Holmes. "Men without jobs do not form families." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-without-jobs-do-not-form-families-155372/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Men without jobs do not form families." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-without-jobs-do-not-form-families-155372/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.











