"Men would be angels, angels would be gods"
About this Quote
Pope is writing from inside the early-18th-century obsession with order: hierarchy as both cosmic architecture and political argument. In that worldview, everyone has a station, and virtue often means consenting to it. The brilliance is that Pope doesn’t moralize directly. He stages a tiny thought experiment where desire is universalized upward until it becomes absurd. The parallel structure makes it feel inevitable, like gravity. Wanting “more” isn’t an individual failing; it’s the default setting of consciousness.
Subtextually, the line is a warning shot against the era’s swelling faith in self-made ascent - commercial expansion, imperial reach, social mobility - without sounding like a reactionary scold. It’s also a rebuke to utopian politics and spiritual pride alike: even sanctity, in this formulation, is not immune to status anxiety. Pope’s couplet logic turns envy into metaphysics, suggesting that the real threat to any “great chain” isn’t rebellion but appetite: the constant, elegant dissatisfaction that makes a stable order feel like a personal insult.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pope, Alexander. (2026, January 17). Men would be angels, angels would be gods. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-would-be-angels-angels-would-be-gods-34978/
Chicago Style
Pope, Alexander. "Men would be angels, angels would be gods." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-would-be-angels-angels-would-be-gods-34978/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Men would be angels, angels would be gods." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/men-would-be-angels-angels-would-be-gods-34978/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.













