"Mistakes are not always the result of someone's ineptitude"
About this Quote
Savitch’s line reads like a quiet rebuke to the lazy reflex of scapegoating. In newsrooms and boardrooms alike, “mistake” gets translated into “someone blew it,” a moral diagnosis that conveniently locates failure in a single flawed person. Her phrasing strips that comfort away. “Not always” does the real work: it concedes accountability without surrendering to the cartoon version of it. She’s not excusing error; she’s widening the frame.
The subtext is structural. Mistakes can be engineered by bad incentives, missing information, rushed timelines, unclear chains of authority, or a culture that punishes hesitation more than it rewards accuracy. Savitch, as a journalist, would have been fluent in how public narratives harden: a misreport becomes a “gaffe,” a production failure becomes “incompetence,” and suddenly the story is about character rather than conditions. Her sentence argues for a more rigorous kind of blame, one that follows the system as attentively as it follows the individual.
Context matters because Savitch worked in an era when broadcast news was becoming both more influential and more unforgiving, with higher stakes and less patience for nuance. The quote anticipates the modern media cycle’s appetite for simple villains. It’s also a professional ethic in disguise: if you want fewer mistakes, don’t just hunt for the person to punish; interrogate the workflow that made the mistake likely. That’s a journalist’s instinct turned outward: keep asking what else is true.
The subtext is structural. Mistakes can be engineered by bad incentives, missing information, rushed timelines, unclear chains of authority, or a culture that punishes hesitation more than it rewards accuracy. Savitch, as a journalist, would have been fluent in how public narratives harden: a misreport becomes a “gaffe,” a production failure becomes “incompetence,” and suddenly the story is about character rather than conditions. Her sentence argues for a more rigorous kind of blame, one that follows the system as attentively as it follows the individual.
Context matters because Savitch worked in an era when broadcast news was becoming both more influential and more unforgiving, with higher stakes and less patience for nuance. The quote anticipates the modern media cycle’s appetite for simple villains. It’s also a professional ethic in disguise: if you want fewer mistakes, don’t just hunt for the person to punish; interrogate the workflow that made the mistake likely. That’s a journalist’s instinct turned outward: keep asking what else is true.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jessica
Add to List









