"Modesty used to be considered a natural female attribute. No more"
About this Quote
A lot is packed into that clipped pivot: “used to be” and “No more.” Linda Chavez isn’t just noting a social change; she’s staging a small before-and-after morality play, with “modesty” as the contested prize. The line works because it performs the very confidence it’s describing: brisk, declarative, allergic to nuance. That tone is the point. It signals a speaker stepping into a culture war over gender norms and announcing that the old script has been torn up.
The phrase “natural female attribute” is doing heavy ideological lifting. “Natural” smuggles in biology as destiny, presenting what is really a historically contingent expectation as something innate. That rhetorical move matters because it tries to make dissent feel like rebellion against nature rather than against social policing. Then Chavez detonates it with “No more,” which can read two ways depending on where you stand: a lament about lost decorum or a recognition that women are refusing an obligation designed to keep them small. The ambiguity is strategic; it invites allies to hear a warning and opponents to hear an admission of progress gone too far.
Contextually, Chavez’s public writing has often engaged feminism’s aftershocks and the politics of family, sexuality, and public behavior. This sentence sits neatly in that terrain: modesty as both virtue and muzzle, “female” as a category under renegotiation, the past as a rhetorical safe harbor. It’s less a sociological observation than a cultural provocation, meant to make the listener choose a side - and reveal what they think women are for.
The phrase “natural female attribute” is doing heavy ideological lifting. “Natural” smuggles in biology as destiny, presenting what is really a historically contingent expectation as something innate. That rhetorical move matters because it tries to make dissent feel like rebellion against nature rather than against social policing. Then Chavez detonates it with “No more,” which can read two ways depending on where you stand: a lament about lost decorum or a recognition that women are refusing an obligation designed to keep them small. The ambiguity is strategic; it invites allies to hear a warning and opponents to hear an admission of progress gone too far.
Contextually, Chavez’s public writing has often engaged feminism’s aftershocks and the politics of family, sexuality, and public behavior. This sentence sits neatly in that terrain: modesty as both virtue and muzzle, “female” as a category under renegotiation, the past as a rhetorical safe harbor. It’s less a sociological observation than a cultural provocation, meant to make the listener choose a side - and reveal what they think women are for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Linda
Add to List











