"More than anything, there are more images in evil. Evil is based far more on the visual, whereas good has no good images at all"
About this Quote
Von Trier is needling a basic fact of cinema: the camera loves trouble. Evil arrives pre-lit, pre-symbolized, ready for the close-up. A knife, a bruise, a uniform, a burning building - these are instantly legible, emotionally sticky, and, crucially, cinematic. Good, by contrast, is often procedural and unphotogenic: restraint, patience, fairness, the slow choice not to harm. You can film a punch; you can’t easily film “not punching” without it reading as emptiness or sentimentality.
The provocation doubles as self-critique. Von Trier’s films repeatedly flirt with the charge that they aestheticize suffering, staging cruelty with an almost painterly attention. By claiming evil has “more images,” he’s confessing the medium’s bias: audiences reward sensation, and sensation frequently means violation. Good risks becoming kitsch because it leans on tired iconography (halos, sunshine, uplift) that feels dishonest next to the messy specificity of pain. Evil, meanwhile, offers detail: texture, stakes, bodies, consequences.
There’s also a Protestant sting here: goodness as inward state rather than outward spectacle. If genuine good is humility or grace, it resists display - the moment it performs itself, it curdles into PR. Von Trier isn’t praising evil so much as admitting its marketing advantage. The unsettling subtext is that art, and especially film, has structural incentives to chase the vividness of harm, then pretend it’s only telling the truth.
The provocation doubles as self-critique. Von Trier’s films repeatedly flirt with the charge that they aestheticize suffering, staging cruelty with an almost painterly attention. By claiming evil has “more images,” he’s confessing the medium’s bias: audiences reward sensation, and sensation frequently means violation. Good risks becoming kitsch because it leans on tired iconography (halos, sunshine, uplift) that feels dishonest next to the messy specificity of pain. Evil, meanwhile, offers detail: texture, stakes, bodies, consequences.
There’s also a Protestant sting here: goodness as inward state rather than outward spectacle. If genuine good is humility or grace, it resists display - the moment it performs itself, it curdles into PR. Von Trier isn’t praising evil so much as admitting its marketing advantage. The unsettling subtext is that art, and especially film, has structural incentives to chase the vividness of harm, then pretend it’s only telling the truth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lars
Add to List








