"More than this, even in those white men who professed religion we found much inconsistency of conduct. They spoke much of spiritual things, while seeking only the material"
About this Quote
Eastman is doing something more devastating than calling out hypocrisy: he is diagnosing a civilizational mismatch between language and appetite. The line targets "those white men who professed religion", a careful narrowing that avoids painting every settler with the same brush while still aiming at a dominant moral posture. "Professed" is the tell. It suggests performance, a public identity worn like a badge, and it sets up the quiet indictment that follows: talk of "spiritual things" functioning as cover for acquisition.
The sentence works because it collapses a whole colonial apparatus into a single contradiction. Missionary rhetoric promised salvation, uplift, and divine order; the lived reality for Indigenous communities often arrived as land hunger, broken treaties, and an economy calibrated to extraction. Eastman frames this not as an abstract theological dispute but as behavioral evidence: "inconsistency of conduct". He is appealing to a standard his audience claims to respect - congruence between belief and action - then showing how easily that standard is waived when profit is on the table.
The subtext carries a double edge. Eastman, writing as a Native intellectual navigating white literary and institutional gatekeepers, adopts a measured tone that reads almost clinical. That restraint is strategic: it makes the accusation harder to dismiss as resentment. The final clause, "seeking only the material", lands like a verdict. It implies that the real religion on display is not Christianity at all, but possession - with spirituality reduced to sales copy for empire.
The sentence works because it collapses a whole colonial apparatus into a single contradiction. Missionary rhetoric promised salvation, uplift, and divine order; the lived reality for Indigenous communities often arrived as land hunger, broken treaties, and an economy calibrated to extraction. Eastman frames this not as an abstract theological dispute but as behavioral evidence: "inconsistency of conduct". He is appealing to a standard his audience claims to respect - congruence between belief and action - then showing how easily that standard is waived when profit is on the table.
The subtext carries a double edge. Eastman, writing as a Native intellectual navigating white literary and institutional gatekeepers, adopts a measured tone that reads almost clinical. That restraint is strategic: it makes the accusation harder to dismiss as resentment. The final clause, "seeking only the material", lands like a verdict. It implies that the real religion on display is not Christianity at all, but possession - with spirituality reduced to sales copy for empire.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
