"Moreover, war has become a thing potentially so terrible and destructive that it should have been the common aim of statesmen to put an end to it forever"
About this Quote
Henderson’s line carries the weary clarity of a statesman who has watched “war” mutate from a grim instrument of policy into an industrial-scale solvent that dissolves societies. The key move is rhetorical: he doesn’t condemn war as immoral so much as make it strategically obsolete. “Potentially so terrible and destructive” reads like an early acknowledgment of modernity’s new math - machine guns, mass conscription, chemical weapons, aerial bombardment - where the ceiling on catastrophe keeps rising. War is no longer a controllable episode; it is a system failure.
The small, telling word is “should.” Henderson isn’t reporting a consensus; he’s chastising the absence of one. He frames peace not as idealism but as professional duty: “the common aim of statesmen.” That phrase quietly indicts the incentives that push leaders toward conflict - prestige, domestic political pressure, imperial competition - by suggesting that competent governance now requires the opposite reflex. It’s a bid to redefine what seriousness in politics looks like.
Context matters: Henderson was a British Labour politician shaped by the First World War and the fragile interwar attempt to build international mechanisms that could restrain great-power violence. His appeal fits the era’s faith in collective security and diplomacy as technology outpaced old codes of limited war. The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: if leaders can’t “put an end to it forever,” they are choosing, by inertia, the next escalation. Peace becomes less a dream than an emergency measure for survival.
The small, telling word is “should.” Henderson isn’t reporting a consensus; he’s chastising the absence of one. He frames peace not as idealism but as professional duty: “the common aim of statesmen.” That phrase quietly indicts the incentives that push leaders toward conflict - prestige, domestic political pressure, imperial competition - by suggesting that competent governance now requires the opposite reflex. It’s a bid to redefine what seriousness in politics looks like.
Context matters: Henderson was a British Labour politician shaped by the First World War and the fragile interwar attempt to build international mechanisms that could restrain great-power violence. His appeal fits the era’s faith in collective security and diplomacy as technology outpaced old codes of limited war. The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: if leaders can’t “put an end to it forever,” they are choosing, by inertia, the next escalation. Peace becomes less a dream than an emergency measure for survival.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List
