"Most Americans are more concerned about the economy and job creation. And they can't understand why the Obama administration or the Democrat majority in Congress wants to pass a bill like the cap-and-trade tax that will cost us jobs, that will hurt our economy, that will drive up costs for families, as well as for small businesses"
About this Quote
Barbour’s sentence is built like a political pry bar: wedge “most Americans” into the conversation, then use it to force the opposition into the role of out-of-touch elites. The opening move isn’t evidence, it’s positioning. By claiming the public is “more concerned” about jobs and the economy, he sets a hierarchy of worries that conveniently demotes climate policy to a boutique priority. It’s a familiar American rhetorical trick: recast long-term risk as a distraction from immediate paychecks.
Calling cap-and-trade a “tax” is the tell. Cap-and-trade was designed as a market mechanism, but Barbour collapses it into the most unpopular word in U.S. politics, then stacks consequences in a rhythmic cascade: “cost us jobs… hurt our economy… drive up costs.” The repetition does two jobs at once: it simulates inevitability and it floods the listener’s mental bandwidth, leaving little room for counter-arguments about innovation, public health, or the costs of inaction.
The subtext is partisan and cultural, not just economic. “They can’t understand why” suggests the policy is irrational on its face, implying either incompetence or contempt from Democrats. “Families” and “small businesses” are invoked as sacred, apolitical stand-ins for virtue; if they’re threatened, the policy must be suspect.
Context matters: this is the late-2000s/early-2010s fight over Obama-era climate legislation, coming off a financial crisis when “job creation” was the master frame. Barbour isn’t merely debating emissions; he’s laundering climate skepticism through kitchen-table anxiety, turning an environmental tool into an identity test about whose reality Washington is supposed to serve.
Calling cap-and-trade a “tax” is the tell. Cap-and-trade was designed as a market mechanism, but Barbour collapses it into the most unpopular word in U.S. politics, then stacks consequences in a rhythmic cascade: “cost us jobs… hurt our economy… drive up costs.” The repetition does two jobs at once: it simulates inevitability and it floods the listener’s mental bandwidth, leaving little room for counter-arguments about innovation, public health, or the costs of inaction.
The subtext is partisan and cultural, not just economic. “They can’t understand why” suggests the policy is irrational on its face, implying either incompetence or contempt from Democrats. “Families” and “small businesses” are invoked as sacred, apolitical stand-ins for virtue; if they’re threatened, the policy must be suspect.
Context matters: this is the late-2000s/early-2010s fight over Obama-era climate legislation, coming off a financial crisis when “job creation” was the master frame. Barbour isn’t merely debating emissions; he’s laundering climate skepticism through kitchen-table anxiety, turning an environmental tool into an identity test about whose reality Washington is supposed to serve.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Haley
Add to List
