"Most Americans in both red and blue states reject and resent the message being sent by Hollywood and some in the media that values are subjective, to be defined by the individual and not by God"
About this Quote
Trent Lott’s line isn’t really about Hollywood; it’s about who gets to set the moral thermostat in America. By pairing “red and blue states,” he claims a bipartisan, common-sense majority, a rhetorical move designed to make dissent feel like elite eccentricity rather than legitimate disagreement. The sentence stages a familiar populist drama: ordinary people versus cultural gatekeepers, faith versus decadence, permanent truths versus fashionable relativism.
The phrase “message being sent” matters. It implies a coordinated campaign rather than a messy marketplace of entertainment, journalism, and opinion. That framing turns cultural change into something done to Americans, not something Americans participate in. It also lets Lott avoid arguing specific controversies (sex, family, religion in public life) by treating them as symptoms of one master idea: “values are subjective.”
Then comes the real power play: “to be defined by the individual and not by God.” He collapses pluralism into selfishness. Individual conscience isn’t presented as liberty but as moral anarchy, while “God” functions as both theological authority and a political shorthand for a particular conservative Christian baseline. The subtext is less “believe in God” than “stop treating morality as negotiable.”
Contextually, this kind of language sits in the long aftershock of the culture wars: the rise of conservative media ecosystems, backlash to changing norms around sexuality and gender, and Republican efforts to turn cultural grievance into electoral cohesion. Lott is offering a neat trade: vote for us, and we’ll punish the tastemakers and restore the idea that right and wrong are not up for debate.
The phrase “message being sent” matters. It implies a coordinated campaign rather than a messy marketplace of entertainment, journalism, and opinion. That framing turns cultural change into something done to Americans, not something Americans participate in. It also lets Lott avoid arguing specific controversies (sex, family, religion in public life) by treating them as symptoms of one master idea: “values are subjective.”
Then comes the real power play: “to be defined by the individual and not by God.” He collapses pluralism into selfishness. Individual conscience isn’t presented as liberty but as moral anarchy, while “God” functions as both theological authority and a political shorthand for a particular conservative Christian baseline. The subtext is less “believe in God” than “stop treating morality as negotiable.”
Contextually, this kind of language sits in the long aftershock of the culture wars: the rise of conservative media ecosystems, backlash to changing norms around sexuality and gender, and Republican efforts to turn cultural grievance into electoral cohesion. Lott is offering a neat trade: vote for us, and we’ll punish the tastemakers and restore the idea that right and wrong are not up for debate.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|
More Quotes by Trent
Add to List

