"Most architects say: I want to use this type of glass, even if it's too reflective or doesn't let enough light in. However, the use of a certain type of glass might change the comfort level"
About this Quote
Jahn is poking a finger at architecture’s most persistent vanity: the urge to treat a building like a rendering that accidentally became real. The line opens with a caricature of the profession - “I want to use this type of glass” - a designer’s wish stated as if materials were mood boards, not physics. By choosing glass as the battleground, he targets a signature of late-20th-century corporate modernism: the glossy curtain wall that photographs beautifully, signals wealth instantly, and quietly punishes the people inside it.
The specificity matters. “Too reflective” isn’t just an aesthetic critique; it’s an indictment of a facade that turns a building into a mirror, more interested in broadcasting an image than managing glare, heat gain, bird strikes, or the street-level experience. “Doesn’t let enough light in” flips the common promise of glass architecture - openness, transparency - into a practical disappointment. The subtext: you can buy the look of daylight without delivering daylight.
Then he lands the real point with a deceptively mild word: “comfort.” Comfort is the unglamorous metric that exposes the gap between architectural desire and human use. In the era of icon buildings and value-engineered envelopes, Jahn is arguing for consequence: material choices are not neutral, and performance is not optional. He’s also hinting at the hidden ecosystem behind glass - coatings, shading strategies, HVAC loads - the way a single seductive specification can dictate the entire building’s behavior.
Spoken by an architect associated with high-tech, glass-forward skylines, it reads less like outsider scolding and more like insider correction: a warning from someone who knows how easily “signature” becomes “suffering.”
The specificity matters. “Too reflective” isn’t just an aesthetic critique; it’s an indictment of a facade that turns a building into a mirror, more interested in broadcasting an image than managing glare, heat gain, bird strikes, or the street-level experience. “Doesn’t let enough light in” flips the common promise of glass architecture - openness, transparency - into a practical disappointment. The subtext: you can buy the look of daylight without delivering daylight.
Then he lands the real point with a deceptively mild word: “comfort.” Comfort is the unglamorous metric that exposes the gap between architectural desire and human use. In the era of icon buildings and value-engineered envelopes, Jahn is arguing for consequence: material choices are not neutral, and performance is not optional. He’s also hinting at the hidden ecosystem behind glass - coatings, shading strategies, HVAC loads - the way a single seductive specification can dictate the entire building’s behavior.
Spoken by an architect associated with high-tech, glass-forward skylines, it reads less like outsider scolding and more like insider correction: a warning from someone who knows how easily “signature” becomes “suffering.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Helmut
Add to List





