"Most of the top actors and actresses may be working in ten or twelve films at the same time, so they will give one director two hours and maybe shoot in Bombay in the morning and Madras in the evening. It happens"
About this Quote
Ray’s line lands like a dry aside, but it’s really a scalpel aimed at an industrial reality: in mainstream Indian cinema, celebrity is a scheduling problem before it’s an artistic presence. The image is almost absurdist - an actor parachuting into Bombay for a couple of hours, then ricocheting to Madras by evening - yet Ray doesn’t grandstand. He ends with the shrugging coda, “It happens,” letting banality do the indictment.
The intent is practical and quietly polemical. Ray is pointing to a system where the star’s body is the scarce resource, not the director’s vision. If performers are “working in ten or twelve films at the same time,” the movie becomes modular: scenes designed around availability, performances stitched together out of fragments, a director forced into traffic management. The subtext is about authorship. Ray, a filmmaker associated with meticulous craft and human-scale realism, is implicitly contrasting his kind of cinema - patient, immersive, attentive to continuity of mood - with a factory model where continuity is what you sacrifice first.
Context matters: Ray’s career sat adjacent to, and often in tension with, the star-driven commercial juggernaut. His observation doesn’t romanticize hardship; it diagnoses incentives. When actors can monetize omnipresence, the culture rewards visibility over depth. Ray’s restrained phrasing is the point: he doesn’t need to call it grotesque. The logistics already are.
The intent is practical and quietly polemical. Ray is pointing to a system where the star’s body is the scarce resource, not the director’s vision. If performers are “working in ten or twelve films at the same time,” the movie becomes modular: scenes designed around availability, performances stitched together out of fragments, a director forced into traffic management. The subtext is about authorship. Ray, a filmmaker associated with meticulous craft and human-scale realism, is implicitly contrasting his kind of cinema - patient, immersive, attentive to continuity of mood - with a factory model where continuity is what you sacrifice first.
Context matters: Ray’s career sat adjacent to, and often in tension with, the star-driven commercial juggernaut. His observation doesn’t romanticize hardship; it diagnoses incentives. When actors can monetize omnipresence, the culture rewards visibility over depth. Ray’s restrained phrasing is the point: he doesn’t need to call it grotesque. The logistics already are.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Satyajit
Add to List



