"Most women are pragmatists who have allowed extremists on the left and right to manipulate the family issue for their own purposes"
About this Quote
Lasch doesn’t flatter women here; he recruits them as the quiet majority in a culture war he thinks is being staged over their heads. Calling “most women” pragmatists is a deliberate reframing of the late-20th-century “family values” battlefield: not a clash of liberated radicals versus traditional saints, but a fight in which ordinary people are trying to make life workable while ideologues weaponize their needs.
The line is built to irritate both camps. The “left” gets tagged for treating family life as a site of false consciousness or as an obstacle to emancipation unless it’s remade on theoretical terms; the “right” gets accused of turning “the family” into a symbolic prop, a moral billboard that can justify rolling back social supports while claiming to protect domestic stability. “Manipulate” is the tell: Lasch implies the argument isn’t really about women’s lived realities but about power, coalition-building, and moral theater.
The subtext is classic Lasch: suspicion of elites (political, cultural, professional) and a belief that modern life hollowed out the institutions that once offered meaning and mutual obligation. He’s writing in the long shadow of second-wave feminism, rising divorce rates, the New Right’s ascendancy, and a media environment primed for polarizing simplifications. “Family issue” becomes a proxy for everything from labor markets to childcare to sexual norms, and Lasch’s move is to insist that practical concerns - security, time, dignity, stability - are being drowned out by rhetorical extremes.
It works because it’s an insult disguised as solidarity: you’re sensible, he says, and that’s precisely why you’ve become someone else’s leverage.
The line is built to irritate both camps. The “left” gets tagged for treating family life as a site of false consciousness or as an obstacle to emancipation unless it’s remade on theoretical terms; the “right” gets accused of turning “the family” into a symbolic prop, a moral billboard that can justify rolling back social supports while claiming to protect domestic stability. “Manipulate” is the tell: Lasch implies the argument isn’t really about women’s lived realities but about power, coalition-building, and moral theater.
The subtext is classic Lasch: suspicion of elites (political, cultural, professional) and a belief that modern life hollowed out the institutions that once offered meaning and mutual obligation. He’s writing in the long shadow of second-wave feminism, rising divorce rates, the New Right’s ascendancy, and a media environment primed for polarizing simplifications. “Family issue” becomes a proxy for everything from labor markets to childcare to sexual norms, and Lasch’s move is to insist that practical concerns - security, time, dignity, stability - are being drowned out by rhetorical extremes.
It works because it’s an insult disguised as solidarity: you’re sensible, he says, and that’s precisely why you’ve become someone else’s leverage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Family |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List



