"Mr. Darwin contributes some striking and ingenious instances of the way in which the principle partially affects the chain, or rather network of life, even to the total obliteration of certain meshes"
About this Quote
Even in apparent praise, Owen can barely resist tightening the screws. Calling Darwin's examples "striking and ingenious" reads like a compliment, but it also subtly fences Darwin in: clever cases, yes, but still just cases. Owen was one of Victorian Britain's most formidable anatomists, a man invested in the authority of established scientific institutions and, not incidentally, in his own intellectual primacy. When Darwin's natural selection arrives, it threatens both a worldview and a professional hierarchy.
The real action is in Owen's metaphors. He grants Darwin a "chain" of life only to correct it into a "network" - a telling pivot from the old linear hierarchy (great chain of being, with humans conveniently near the top) to a more entangled, less flattering picture. That parenthetical "or rather network" is Owen trying to manage the conceptual damage: if nature is a network, it is harder to defend fixed ranks, fixed kinds, and the comforting idea that life trends toward us.
Then comes the loaded phrase: "total obliteration of certain meshes". Owen is acknowledging extinction not as a regrettable footnote but as a structural feature of Darwin's mechanism. Selection doesn't merely polish; it erases. The subtext is anxiety dressed up as analytical clarity: Darwin isn't just explaining variation, he's offering a principle that can make entire lineages vanish, and with them any argument that nature is guided by inherent progress or design.
Owen's intent, finally, is tactical. He concedes Darwin's explanatory reach while framing it as "partial" - influential, disturbing, but not sovereign. It's the rhetoric of a gatekeeper watching a new theory kick at the door.
The real action is in Owen's metaphors. He grants Darwin a "chain" of life only to correct it into a "network" - a telling pivot from the old linear hierarchy (great chain of being, with humans conveniently near the top) to a more entangled, less flattering picture. That parenthetical "or rather network" is Owen trying to manage the conceptual damage: if nature is a network, it is harder to defend fixed ranks, fixed kinds, and the comforting idea that life trends toward us.
Then comes the loaded phrase: "total obliteration of certain meshes". Owen is acknowledging extinction not as a regrettable footnote but as a structural feature of Darwin's mechanism. Selection doesn't merely polish; it erases. The subtext is anxiety dressed up as analytical clarity: Darwin isn't just explaining variation, he's offering a principle that can make entire lineages vanish, and with them any argument that nature is guided by inherent progress or design.
Owen's intent, finally, is tactical. He concedes Darwin's explanatory reach while framing it as "partial" - influential, disturbing, but not sovereign. It's the rhetoric of a gatekeeper watching a new theory kick at the door.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List



