"Mr. President, How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"
About this Quote
The intent is less to solicit strategy than to offer validation. It hands the president an opening to dismiss dissent without wrestling with its claims. If your adversaries are irrational by definition, compromise becomes not just unnecessary but irresponsible. That’s the subtext: govern as if the other side isn’t an alternate constituency but a malfunction.
Context matters because the question performs a particular kind of journalism: access-seeking, narrative-friendly, built for a clean soundbite. It casts the president as the adult in the room, surrounded by deluded actors, and invites a response that reads as leadership even if it’s just contempt with a steady tone. The brilliance, if you can call it that, is its plausible deniability. It can be defended as concern about polarization while functioning as a framing device that hardens it.
It also foreshadows a media era where “reality” becomes a partisan possession. The question doesn’t just describe division; it helps manufacture the terms of it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Gannon, Jeff. (2026, January 17). Mr. President, How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/mr-president-how-are-you-going-to-work-with-75989/
Chicago Style
Gannon, Jeff. "Mr. President, How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/mr-president-how-are-you-going-to-work-with-75989/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Mr. President, How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/mr-president-how-are-you-going-to-work-with-75989/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







