"Murdoch paid too much for the Wall Street Journal even when he didn't have any competition"
About this Quote
The line carries Redstone’s own corporate subtext: in old-media empires, price is never only about cash flow. Owning the Wall Street Journal meant owning a high-trust signal read by elites who move markets and make policy. Redstone is suggesting Murdoch’s real ROI was influence, agenda-setting, and respectability - the kind that can launder partisan power through institutional prestige.
Context sharpens the insult. Murdoch’s 2007 purchase of Dow Jones was controversial precisely because it looked like an ideological acquisition dressed up as a synergistic one. Redstone, a rival mogul with his own reputation for hard-nosed dealmaking, frames Murdoch as irrationally acquisitive, almost romantic: a man so hungry for a particular kind of legitimacy that he bid against an imaginary opponent. It’s a businessman’s burn with a political aftertaste: the market didn’t force this; ego and ambition did.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Redstone, Sumner. (2026, January 15). Murdoch paid too much for the Wall Street Journal even when he didn't have any competition. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/murdoch-paid-too-much-for-the-wall-street-journal-171001/
Chicago Style
Redstone, Sumner. "Murdoch paid too much for the Wall Street Journal even when he didn't have any competition." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/murdoch-paid-too-much-for-the-wall-street-journal-171001/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Murdoch paid too much for the Wall Street Journal even when he didn't have any competition." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/murdoch-paid-too-much-for-the-wall-street-journal-171001/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



