"My abiding theme is separations"
About this Quote
A novelist announcing “My abiding theme is separations” isn’t confessing a quirk; she’s naming a worldview. “Abiding” does heavy lifting: not a passing interest, not a marketable motif, but a lifelong pressure point. And “separations,” plural, widens the scope beyond romance or divorce into the full architecture of modern disconnection: leaving home, slipping class positions, drifting from friends, the quiet estrangement inside families, the split between the self you perform and the self you can’t quite inhabit.
Rossner wrote in an era when American fiction was increasingly preoccupied with private life as public evidence. The women’s movement, rising divorce rates, a more mobile and atomized middle class: separation wasn’t just a plot device, it was a social condition. Her phrasing implies that people don’t simply break apart; they are sorted, parceled, and reclassified by institutions and expectations. The verb is missing on purpose. She doesn’t say who separates whom, which smuggles in the bleak suggestion that separation is ambient, structural, almost atmospheric.
The line also hints at craft. “Separations” is a generator of narrative energy: every story starts when something or someone is pulled away. It’s conflict without melodrama, a premise that invites psychological precision rather than spectacle. Rossner’s intent feels less like preaching than like staking out a moral territory: pay attention to the costs of distance, especially the ordinary kinds we’re trained to minimize. Separation, in her hands, isn’t an ending; it’s the condition that makes character legible.
Rossner wrote in an era when American fiction was increasingly preoccupied with private life as public evidence. The women’s movement, rising divorce rates, a more mobile and atomized middle class: separation wasn’t just a plot device, it was a social condition. Her phrasing implies that people don’t simply break apart; they are sorted, parceled, and reclassified by institutions and expectations. The verb is missing on purpose. She doesn’t say who separates whom, which smuggles in the bleak suggestion that separation is ambient, structural, almost atmospheric.
The line also hints at craft. “Separations” is a generator of narrative energy: every story starts when something or someone is pulled away. It’s conflict without melodrama, a premise that invites psychological precision rather than spectacle. Rossner’s intent feels less like preaching than like staking out a moral territory: pay attention to the costs of distance, especially the ordinary kinds we’re trained to minimize. Separation, in her hands, isn’t an ending; it’s the condition that makes character legible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Heartbreak |
|---|
More Quotes by Judith
Add to List
