"My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading"
About this Quote
Hardy is writing from a century that industrialized both war and news. The Victorian appetite for empire and dispatches, later followed by the Great War's mechanized slaughter, created a public trained to consume catastrophe as narrative. As a novelist obsessed with fate, social constraint, and the slow violence of convention, Hardy knows that "peace" can still be brutal - just not spectacular. His own Wessex tragedies thrive on the pressures of ordinary life; yet he concedes that the market, and maybe the human brain, reads rupture more readily than continuity.
The subtext is self-incriminating. Hardy isn't praising war; he's diagnosing a culture that rewards it with attention, coherence, even meaning. The sentence is a moral complaint disguised as a craft note: if we only call history "good" when it rattles, we're complicit in preferring noise to repair, trauma to maintenance.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Hardy, Thomas. (2026, January 18). My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/my-argument-is-that-war-makes-rattling-good-3181/
Chicago Style
Hardy, Thomas. "My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/my-argument-is-that-war-makes-rattling-good-3181/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/my-argument-is-that-war-makes-rattling-good-3181/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.











