"My assignment was exclusively in the research field, and my first published paper, On the Optimal Use of Winds for Flight Planning, was the outgrowth of that work"
About this Quote
The disarming thing here is how casually Arrow drops a detail that rewrites your mental file on him. The patron saint of impossibility theorems and information economics is talking about wind, flight planning, and an early paper that sounds like it belongs to an aeronautical engineer. That understatement is the point. Arrow isn’t selling genius; he’s modeling a kind of mid-century scientific temperament where the boundary between “economics” and “operations research” barely mattered, especially under the pressures of wartime and postwar planning.
“Assignment” does quiet work. It frames intellectual life as deployment: you go where the problem is, not where your brand is. The subtext is institutional, not autobiographical. Arrow is gesturing at the ecosystem that made his style of economics possible: government and military research agendas, the rise of optimization, and the migration of mathematical tools across domains. A paper about exploiting winds is, in miniature, the Arrow worldview: treat constraints seriously, assume scarce resources, and search for optimal rules under uncertainty. You can almost see the later economist taking shape in the engineer’s question: given forces you can’t control (winds, information, incentives), what’s the best feasible plan?
There’s also a mild corrective embedded in the anecdote. Arrow’s career is often narrated as pure theory, as if he emerged fully formed from axioms. He’s reminding you that abstraction usually begins as a response to logistics and friction. Even his most rarefied results were born downstream from concrete problems: how to make decisions when the world won’t cooperate.
“Assignment” does quiet work. It frames intellectual life as deployment: you go where the problem is, not where your brand is. The subtext is institutional, not autobiographical. Arrow is gesturing at the ecosystem that made his style of economics possible: government and military research agendas, the rise of optimization, and the migration of mathematical tools across domains. A paper about exploiting winds is, in miniature, the Arrow worldview: treat constraints seriously, assume scarce resources, and search for optimal rules under uncertainty. You can almost see the later economist taking shape in the engineer’s question: given forces you can’t control (winds, information, incentives), what’s the best feasible plan?
There’s also a mild corrective embedded in the anecdote. Arrow’s career is often narrated as pure theory, as if he emerged fully formed from axioms. He’s reminding you that abstraction usually begins as a response to logistics and friction. Even his most rarefied results were born downstream from concrete problems: how to make decisions when the world won’t cooperate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List
