"My brother arrived some months after my father left. Um, and he ah, was thus eight years younger than me and it was um, you know, it was such a time that my mother probably had people wondering was it his"
About this Quote
A family anecdote told with the brakes on: Keneally’s ums and self-corrections aren’t verbal clutter so much as a live performance of restraint. He’s circling something volatile - abandonment, sexual rumor, Catholic small-town judgment - without giving it the clean shape of confession. The hesitation is the point. It signals both the shame that communities impose and the enduring reflex to manage that shame decades later.
The timeline lands like a quiet detonator. Father leaves; “some months after,” a brother arrives. Keneally doesn’t need to spell out the insinuation. He lets the listener do the arithmetic, and then he supplies the social consequence: “people wondering was it his.” The grammar tilts into the vernacular, which makes it feel overheard rather than crafted - not a novelist’s polished line, but a man returning to an old neighborhood where everybody kept score. He’s naming the real antagonist: not just the missing father, but the surveillance culture that fills in gaps with gossip.
There’s also a subtle loyalty embedded in the vagueness. “Probably” offers his mother a protective buffer, even as he admits the cruelty of speculation. He won’t accuse her community outright; he won’t exonerate it either. That moral hedging reads less like indecision than an ethic: the recognition that family stories are rarely court cases, and that damage is often delivered through insinuation, not evidence.
For a novelist known for historical sweep, this is history at its most intimate: how stigma gets archived in the body as hesitation, and how narrative becomes a way to approach pain without reopening it fully.
The timeline lands like a quiet detonator. Father leaves; “some months after,” a brother arrives. Keneally doesn’t need to spell out the insinuation. He lets the listener do the arithmetic, and then he supplies the social consequence: “people wondering was it his.” The grammar tilts into the vernacular, which makes it feel overheard rather than crafted - not a novelist’s polished line, but a man returning to an old neighborhood where everybody kept score. He’s naming the real antagonist: not just the missing father, but the surveillance culture that fills in gaps with gossip.
There’s also a subtle loyalty embedded in the vagueness. “Probably” offers his mother a protective buffer, even as he admits the cruelty of speculation. He won’t accuse her community outright; he won’t exonerate it either. That moral hedging reads less like indecision than an ethic: the recognition that family stories are rarely court cases, and that damage is often delivered through insinuation, not evidence.
For a novelist known for historical sweep, this is history at its most intimate: how stigma gets archived in the body as hesitation, and how narrative becomes a way to approach pain without reopening it fully.
Quote Details
| Topic | Brother |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
