"My Department has already recognised this and has been working specifically on the technical support issue since January and will offer advice to schools during the Autumn term"
About this Quote
Bureaucratic reassurance dressed up as momentum: that opening "has already recognised this" is doing more political work than any concrete promise that follows. Estelle Morris is speaking in the classic register of ministerial damage-control, where the first priority is to establish competence retroactively. The phrase implies the problem is neither new nor ignored, even if the public is only now hearing about it. "Recognised" is deliberately passive; it admits awareness without conceding culpability.
The sentence then shifts into process language that sounds industrious while staying safely non-specific. "Working specifically on the technical support issue since January" smuggles in a timeline meant to inoculate against accusations of drift. January is close enough to feel like swift action, far enough back to suggest sustained effort. But "working on" is wonderfully elastic: it can mean meetings, memos, pilots, or simply monitoring.
The real tell is the modesty of the outcome: "will offer advice to schools during the Autumn term". Not funding, not staffing, not new infrastructure - advice. Responsibility is subtly devolved down the chain. If systems fail, the center can argue it empowered schools; if things improve, the department can claim credit for guidance. Even "during the Autumn term" buys time in an academic calendar that always feels perennially on the verge of crisis.
Contextually, this sits in that late-1990s/early-2000s push to modernize schools with IT, when government rhetoric often outran implementation. The subtext is a familiar one: we are in control, action is underway, and the consequences - and the messy details - are for someone else to manage.
The sentence then shifts into process language that sounds industrious while staying safely non-specific. "Working specifically on the technical support issue since January" smuggles in a timeline meant to inoculate against accusations of drift. January is close enough to feel like swift action, far enough back to suggest sustained effort. But "working on" is wonderfully elastic: it can mean meetings, memos, pilots, or simply monitoring.
The real tell is the modesty of the outcome: "will offer advice to schools during the Autumn term". Not funding, not staffing, not new infrastructure - advice. Responsibility is subtly devolved down the chain. If systems fail, the center can argue it empowered schools; if things improve, the department can claim credit for guidance. Even "during the Autumn term" buys time in an academic calendar that always feels perennially on the verge of crisis.
Contextually, this sits in that late-1990s/early-2000s push to modernize schools with IT, when government rhetoric often outran implementation. The subtext is a familiar one: we are in control, action is underway, and the consequences - and the messy details - are for someone else to manage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Estelle
Add to List



