"My generation of the Sixties, with all our great ideals, destroyed liberalism, because of our excesses"
About this Quote
Paglia drops a Molotov cocktail wrapped in a confession: the Sixties didn’t just fail to deliver on its ideals, it actively sabotaged the political tradition it thought it was rescuing. The line works because it turns the usual moral hierarchy upside down. “Great ideals” is there as bait, an acknowledgment that disarms the listener before the blade comes out: “destroyed liberalism.” She’s not interested in the nostalgic version of the decade as pure liberation; she’s after the hangover - the way righteous fervor can curdle into dogma.
The key word is “excesses,” a deliberately elastic charge. It suggests not only street chaos or countercultural indulgence, but the broader impulse to treat institutions as inherently illegitimate and norms as mere oppression. In Paglia’s worldview, that style of politics doesn’t broaden freedom; it narrows it, because it replaces liberalism’s procedural patience (pluralism, speech, incremental reform) with purity tests and theatrical radicalism. Her “my generation” is doing rhetorical double duty: it signals credibility (she was there) and assigns guilt (she won’t let her cohort outsource the blame).
Context matters: Paglia has spent decades as a contrarian critic of campus politics and what she sees as sanctimony dressed up as progress. This quote is aimed less at the Sixties themselves than at their institutional afterlife - the cultural left that inherited the era’s moral certainty without its courage. The sting is strategic: by framing liberalism’s decline as self-inflicted, she challenges today’s progressives to choose between being insurgents forever or stewards of a workable, tolerant society.
The key word is “excesses,” a deliberately elastic charge. It suggests not only street chaos or countercultural indulgence, but the broader impulse to treat institutions as inherently illegitimate and norms as mere oppression. In Paglia’s worldview, that style of politics doesn’t broaden freedom; it narrows it, because it replaces liberalism’s procedural patience (pluralism, speech, incremental reform) with purity tests and theatrical radicalism. Her “my generation” is doing rhetorical double duty: it signals credibility (she was there) and assigns guilt (she won’t let her cohort outsource the blame).
Context matters: Paglia has spent decades as a contrarian critic of campus politics and what she sees as sanctimony dressed up as progress. This quote is aimed less at the Sixties themselves than at their institutional afterlife - the cultural left that inherited the era’s moral certainty without its courage. The sting is strategic: by framing liberalism’s decline as self-inflicted, she challenges today’s progressives to choose between being insurgents forever or stewards of a workable, tolerant society.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Camille
Add to List






