"My guiding principle is that prosperity can be shared. We can create wealth together. The global economy is not a zero-sum game"
About this Quote
Gillard’s line is calibrated to do two things at once: reassure anxious voters at home while staking a claim in a global argument about fairness. “Prosperity can be shared” sounds like soft optimism, but it’s also a hard rebuke to the politics of scarcity - the idea that if someone else is rising, you must be falling. By insisting “we can create wealth together,” she shifts the focus from dividing an existing pie to expanding it, a rhetorical move that lets a center-left leader defend openness to trade, migration, and investment without sounding like she’s shrugging at inequality.
The subtext is defensive, and that’s what makes it work. In the post-2008 atmosphere, “global economy” had become shorthand for forces that felt distant, unaccountable, and rigged. Calling it “not a zero-sum game” isn’t a classroom definition; it’s an attempt to puncture a mood: the resentful suspicion that elites are winning by definition. Gillard’s phrasing tries to detach global integration from the narrative of national loss.
Context matters because Gillard governed in a period when Australia benefited from the mining boom and deep trade ties with Asia, especially China - prosperity that could be framed as either smart engagement or dangerous dependence. Her argument implies a bargain: globalization is defensible if its gains are actively distributed, not merely celebrated. The quiet challenge is directed at both sides: protectionists who peddle fear, and market purists who treat “wealth creation” as self-justifying even when it pools at the top.
The subtext is defensive, and that’s what makes it work. In the post-2008 atmosphere, “global economy” had become shorthand for forces that felt distant, unaccountable, and rigged. Calling it “not a zero-sum game” isn’t a classroom definition; it’s an attempt to puncture a mood: the resentful suspicion that elites are winning by definition. Gillard’s phrasing tries to detach global integration from the narrative of national loss.
Context matters because Gillard governed in a period when Australia benefited from the mining boom and deep trade ties with Asia, especially China - prosperity that could be framed as either smart engagement or dangerous dependence. Her argument implies a bargain: globalization is defensible if its gains are actively distributed, not merely celebrated. The quiet challenge is directed at both sides: protectionists who peddle fear, and market purists who treat “wealth creation” as self-justifying even when it pools at the top.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|
More Quotes by Julia
Add to List





