"My office has been one of the most scrupulous in the country with regard to the protection of individual rights. I've been on record for years in law journals and books as championing the rights of the individual against the oppressive power of the state"
About this Quote
It takes real rhetorical nerve to cast yourself as the last decent man between citizens and “the oppressive power of the state” while speaking from inside the state. Jim Garrison’s line is built to perform a paradox: he claims moral purity (“one of the most scrupulous”) and positions his office as a rights-protecting firewall, not a prosecutorial weapon. That’s not just self-description; it’s preemptive defense.
The intent reads like a legal brief aimed at the court of public opinion. Garrison doesn’t cite outcomes, he cites paperwork: “on record for years,” “law journals and books.” He’s laundering credibility through institutional traces, the way a politician uses endorsements. It’s an appeal to authority that also implies persecution: if I’m the champion of individuals, then anyone attacking me is, by extension, attacking individual rights.
Subtext: don’t look too closely at my methods. The phrase “oppressive power of the state” smuggles in a convenient villain and reframes scrutiny as repression. In Garrison’s hands, “the state” becomes a shape-shifting antagonist he can invoke even while wielding subpoenas, indictments, and publicity. It’s a classic maneuver for a public servant under controversy: redefine your exercise of power as resistance to power.
Context matters because Garrison is inseparable from his high-voltage JFK assassination investigation and his media-forward persona. The quote reads like an attempt to seize the ethical high ground amid accusations that his office pursued sweeping theories and aggressive tactics. He’s not merely arguing he’s right; he’s arguing he’s righteous, and that’s the more useful claim when the facts are contested.
The intent reads like a legal brief aimed at the court of public opinion. Garrison doesn’t cite outcomes, he cites paperwork: “on record for years,” “law journals and books.” He’s laundering credibility through institutional traces, the way a politician uses endorsements. It’s an appeal to authority that also implies persecution: if I’m the champion of individuals, then anyone attacking me is, by extension, attacking individual rights.
Subtext: don’t look too closely at my methods. The phrase “oppressive power of the state” smuggles in a convenient villain and reframes scrutiny as repression. In Garrison’s hands, “the state” becomes a shape-shifting antagonist he can invoke even while wielding subpoenas, indictments, and publicity. It’s a classic maneuver for a public servant under controversy: redefine your exercise of power as resistance to power.
Context matters because Garrison is inseparable from his high-voltage JFK assassination investigation and his media-forward persona. The quote reads like an attempt to seize the ethical high ground amid accusations that his office pursued sweeping theories and aggressive tactics. He’s not merely arguing he’s right; he’s arguing he’s righteous, and that’s the more useful claim when the facts are contested.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List





