"My passion and great enjoyment for architecture, and the reason the older I get the more I enjoy it, is because I believe we - architects - can effect the quality of life of the people"
About this Quote
Rogers slips a quiet provocation into what sounds like a benign professional credo: architecture is not a luxury object but a lever on everyday life. The line’s emotional engine is that aging hasn’t made him more nostalgic; it’s made him more convinced. That’s a revealing arc for a designer whose career rode the crest of high-tech optimism (Pompidou, Lloyd’s) and then ran headlong into the public realities of cities: who gets space, who gets light, who gets access, who gets priced out.
The phrase “we - architects -” does a lot of work. It’s a self-correction and a defense, acknowledging that architects are often accused of operating in a bubble, then insisting on relevance anyway. Rogers isn’t claiming artists’ autonomy; he’s staking a civic claim. “Effect the quality of life” is deliberately broad, almost bureaucratic, because the point isn’t a single building’s beauty. It’s the systemic stuff that rarely photographs well: density that doesn’t crush, public circulation that feels safe, housing that isn’t a punishment, streets that invite people to linger instead of flee.
There’s subtext, too, about responsibility. “Passion” and “enjoyment” can sound indulgent, so he justifies pleasure through consequence: it’s okay to love this work because it materially touches strangers. In a late-20th-century landscape where architecture became a branding tool and starchitects became celebrities, Rogers’ intent reads like a corrective. He’s arguing for architecture as social infrastructure, and for the architect as an accountable participant in democracy, not its decorator.
The phrase “we - architects -” does a lot of work. It’s a self-correction and a defense, acknowledging that architects are often accused of operating in a bubble, then insisting on relevance anyway. Rogers isn’t claiming artists’ autonomy; he’s staking a civic claim. “Effect the quality of life” is deliberately broad, almost bureaucratic, because the point isn’t a single building’s beauty. It’s the systemic stuff that rarely photographs well: density that doesn’t crush, public circulation that feels safe, housing that isn’t a punishment, streets that invite people to linger instead of flee.
There’s subtext, too, about responsibility. “Passion” and “enjoyment” can sound indulgent, so he justifies pleasure through consequence: it’s okay to love this work because it materially touches strangers. In a late-20th-century landscape where architecture became a branding tool and starchitects became celebrities, Rogers’ intent reads like a corrective. He’s arguing for architecture as social infrastructure, and for the architect as an accountable participant in democracy, not its decorator.
Quote Details
| Topic | Career |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List




