"My psycho-analytic work has convinced me that when in the baby's mind the conflicts between love and hate arise, and the fears of losing the loved one become active, a very important step is made in development"
About this Quote
Klein is smuggling a radical claim into the calm, clinical cadence of developmental “steps”: maturity begins not with innocence, but with ambivalence. She insists the baby is already a battleground where love and hate collide, and that this collision is productive. The phrase “when in the baby’s mind” is doing heavy lifting, aimed squarely at sentimental notions of infancy as a pre-moral blank slate. For Klein, psychic life doesn’t switch on later; it arrives early, messy, and morally charged.
Her intent is double: to elevate the emotional seriousness of early childhood and to validate psychoanalysis as an empirical discipline (“my psycho-analytic work has convinced me”). That personal witness functions as both authority and provocation in a field still arguing about what can be known, and when. She’s not offering a comforting narrative of linear growth; she’s arguing that anxiety is developmental fuel. “Fears of losing the loved one” reframes attachment as inherently precarious, suggesting that love is never just warmth but also a threat: the loved object can disappear, withdraw, or be damaged by one’s own aggression.
The subtext is Klein’s distinctive object-relations worldview: the infant relates to “the loved one” as an internalized object, not merely a caretaker in the room. Development hinges on recognizing that the same person can be the target of desire and rage. That recognition hurts, and Klein makes the hurt the point. In the interwar-to-postwar psychoanalytic moment, with Europe saturated in violence and fractured loyalties, her emphasis on hate’s early presence reads less like pessimism than like a theory built to explain how ordinary tenderness coexists with cruelty - and how growing up means learning to live with both without splitting the world into saints and monsters.
Her intent is double: to elevate the emotional seriousness of early childhood and to validate psychoanalysis as an empirical discipline (“my psycho-analytic work has convinced me”). That personal witness functions as both authority and provocation in a field still arguing about what can be known, and when. She’s not offering a comforting narrative of linear growth; she’s arguing that anxiety is developmental fuel. “Fears of losing the loved one” reframes attachment as inherently precarious, suggesting that love is never just warmth but also a threat: the loved object can disappear, withdraw, or be damaged by one’s own aggression.
The subtext is Klein’s distinctive object-relations worldview: the infant relates to “the loved one” as an internalized object, not merely a caretaker in the room. Development hinges on recognizing that the same person can be the target of desire and rage. That recognition hurts, and Klein makes the hurt the point. In the interwar-to-postwar psychoanalytic moment, with Europe saturated in violence and fractured loyalties, her emphasis on hate’s early presence reads less like pessimism than like a theory built to explain how ordinary tenderness coexists with cruelty - and how growing up means learning to live with both without splitting the world into saints and monsters.
Quote Details
| Topic | Parenting |
|---|
More Quotes by Melanie
Add to List








