"My son is not wild about going back to Iraq, but he'd sure rather do that than sacrifice all that he and his fellow soldiers have accomplished by leaving too early and inviting chaos"
About this Quote
The sentence performs a careful moral judo move: it nods to fatigue and fear ("not wild") only to convert them into fuel for recommitment. Bond borrows the intimacy of family to launder a geopolitical argument through parental credibility. By putting his son on the front line of the rhetoric, he tries to make escalation sound less like partisan insistence and more like reluctant duty.
The pivot phrase is "but he'd sure rather". It frames the choice as binary: return to Iraq or "sacrifice" accomplishment. Withdrawal becomes not a strategy but a betrayal. That loaded verb sets up the emotional trap: if you want troops home, you must also accept responsibility for dishonoring their work. It's a classic wartime syllogism in American politics, where the war's legitimacy is defended by invoking the troops' investment rather than the policy's merits.
"Leaving too early" does more than argue timing; it smuggles in the assumption that staying is the default adulthood and leaving is impatience. Then "inviting chaos" supplies the specter that ends debate: not just risk, but catastrophe, with the implied accusation that critics are naive about consequences. The subtext is deterrence aimed at domestic opponents as much as foreign enemies.
Context matters: as Iraq’s occupation dragged on and public support frayed, "accomplished" became a rhetorical patch over unclear outcomes. Bond’s line doesn’t prove success; it insists that acknowledging failure would be worse than enduring it.
The pivot phrase is "but he'd sure rather". It frames the choice as binary: return to Iraq or "sacrifice" accomplishment. Withdrawal becomes not a strategy but a betrayal. That loaded verb sets up the emotional trap: if you want troops home, you must also accept responsibility for dishonoring their work. It's a classic wartime syllogism in American politics, where the war's legitimacy is defended by invoking the troops' investment rather than the policy's merits.
"Leaving too early" does more than argue timing; it smuggles in the assumption that staying is the default adulthood and leaving is impatience. Then "inviting chaos" supplies the specter that ends debate: not just risk, but catastrophe, with the implied accusation that critics are naive about consequences. The subtext is deterrence aimed at domestic opponents as much as foreign enemies.
Context matters: as Iraq’s occupation dragged on and public support frayed, "accomplished" became a rhetorical patch over unclear outcomes. Bond’s line doesn’t prove success; it insists that acknowledging failure would be worse than enduring it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Kit
Add to List
