"My state has the highest child poverty rate in all of New England, above the national average"
About this Quote
A line like this isn’t meant to inspire; it’s meant to indict. Patrick J. Kennedy reaches for a blunt, comparative metric - “highest in all of New England,” “above the national average” - because numbers travel well in politics. They sound objective, hard to argue with, and they quietly assign blame without naming a culprit. The message is: whatever story you think this state tells about itself, the receipts don’t match.
The intent is twofold. First, it punctures the region’s self-image. New England trades on an aura of good schools, civic seriousness, and relative prosperity; “child poverty” is the statistic that makes that brand look like marketing. Second, it reframes debate around urgency and priority. By specifying children, Kennedy sidesteps the moral fatigue that can attach to poverty rhetoric. Adults can be judged; kids function as a political veto against cynicism.
The subtext is a challenge to complacency inside a wealthy neighborhood. If your state is underperforming even among peers with similar histories and institutions, “that’s just how the economy is” stops sounding like an explanation and starts sounding like a choice. It also sets up a policy argument without stating it: if the problem is measurable and exceptional, then targeted intervention is justified - expanded safety nets, housing support, healthcare access, wage policy.
Context matters, too: as a Kennedy, he speaks from within a dynasty associated with liberal governance and public obligation. That pedigree turns the sentence into an internal critique of Democratic strongholds as much as a partisan jab. It’s not a slogan. It’s a pressure point.
The intent is twofold. First, it punctures the region’s self-image. New England trades on an aura of good schools, civic seriousness, and relative prosperity; “child poverty” is the statistic that makes that brand look like marketing. Second, it reframes debate around urgency and priority. By specifying children, Kennedy sidesteps the moral fatigue that can attach to poverty rhetoric. Adults can be judged; kids function as a political veto against cynicism.
The subtext is a challenge to complacency inside a wealthy neighborhood. If your state is underperforming even among peers with similar histories and institutions, “that’s just how the economy is” stops sounding like an explanation and starts sounding like a choice. It also sets up a policy argument without stating it: if the problem is measurable and exceptional, then targeted intervention is justified - expanded safety nets, housing support, healthcare access, wage policy.
Context matters, too: as a Kennedy, he speaks from within a dynasty associated with liberal governance and public obligation. That pedigree turns the sentence into an internal critique of Democratic strongholds as much as a partisan jab. It’s not a slogan. It’s a pressure point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Patrick
Add to List





