"My theme for philanthropy is the same approach I used with technology: to find a need and fill it"
About this Quote
Philanthropy, in An Wang's framing, is not a confession booth or a victory lap. It's product development with a moral address. "Find a need and fill it" sounds like Silicon Valley boilerplate now, but coming from a computer-industry builder who watched postwar America turn engineering into national identity, it carries a particular edge: giving is treated as an extension of competence, not emotion.
The intent is managerial clarity. Wang is telling you his generosity isn't improvisational; it follows a repeatable method. That matters because philanthropy is often criticized as either vanity or guilt. By aligning it with "technology", he borrows the legitimacy of problem-solving culture: needs can be identified, solutions can be designed, outcomes can be measured. It's a claim about efficiency and a defense against the suspicion that rich people give to feel good rather than to do good.
The subtext is also a quiet assertion of authority. "Need" is not a neutral category; the person who gets to define it sets the agenda. Wang's approach implies that social problems are legible in the same way technical bottlenecks are legible, and that a founder's instincts scale from machines to communities. That can be inspiring (it prizes pragmatism over performative sentiment), but it also hints at a technocratic blind spot: some needs aren't "filled" by a solution so much as negotiated through power, politics, and long-term care.
In context, it's an early articulation of what we'd now call philanthropic entrepreneurship: the donor as builder, not patron, applying the logic of innovation to the messy human world.
The intent is managerial clarity. Wang is telling you his generosity isn't improvisational; it follows a repeatable method. That matters because philanthropy is often criticized as either vanity or guilt. By aligning it with "technology", he borrows the legitimacy of problem-solving culture: needs can be identified, solutions can be designed, outcomes can be measured. It's a claim about efficiency and a defense against the suspicion that rich people give to feel good rather than to do good.
The subtext is also a quiet assertion of authority. "Need" is not a neutral category; the person who gets to define it sets the agenda. Wang's approach implies that social problems are legible in the same way technical bottlenecks are legible, and that a founder's instincts scale from machines to communities. That can be inspiring (it prizes pragmatism over performative sentiment), but it also hints at a technocratic blind spot: some needs aren't "filled" by a solution so much as negotiated through power, politics, and long-term care.
In context, it's an early articulation of what we'd now call philanthropic entrepreneurship: the donor as builder, not patron, applying the logic of innovation to the messy human world.
Quote Details
| Topic | Kindness |
|---|
More Quotes by An
Add to List
