"My work is intensely personal"
About this Quote
There’s a defensive steeliness hiding inside that soft-sounding word: personal. When Andres Serrano says, "My work is intensely personal", he’s not offering diary-page intimacy so much as staking a claim in a culture that keeps trying to subpoena his images for evidence. Serrano’s photographs have been treated less like art objects than public incidents, with Piss Christ (1987) becoming a flashpoint for the late-’80s/early-’90s NEA wars and the American argument over whether provocation equals obscenity. In that environment, "personal" is a shield and a dare: you can be offended, but you can’t prosecute a private conscience.
The subtext is that Serrano’s most inflammatory materials - bodily fluids, religious iconography, the slick, reverent lighting borrowed from Old Master painting - aren’t cheap shocks. They’re his way of staging devotion and disgust in the same frame, insisting that the sacred and the abject are already cohabiting in modern life. Calling it "intensely personal" reframes the work from blasphemy to testimony: not a prank on faith, but a confrontation with how faith, taboo, mortality, and power actually feel.
It also punctures a common misunderstanding about transgressive art: that it’s made to antagonize an audience. Serrano’s line suggests the opposite. The audience arrives after the fact, often as a jury. "Intensely" matters because it signals labor and risk - emotional, spiritual, reputational. He’s asserting authorship over meaning in a marketplace that prefers scandal to nuance, and in doing so, he makes the most private motive into a public argument about who gets to define reverence.
The subtext is that Serrano’s most inflammatory materials - bodily fluids, religious iconography, the slick, reverent lighting borrowed from Old Master painting - aren’t cheap shocks. They’re his way of staging devotion and disgust in the same frame, insisting that the sacred and the abject are already cohabiting in modern life. Calling it "intensely personal" reframes the work from blasphemy to testimony: not a prank on faith, but a confrontation with how faith, taboo, mortality, and power actually feel.
It also punctures a common misunderstanding about transgressive art: that it’s made to antagonize an audience. Serrano’s line suggests the opposite. The audience arrives after the fact, often as a jury. "Intensely" matters because it signals labor and risk - emotional, spiritual, reputational. He’s asserting authorship over meaning in a marketplace that prefers scandal to nuance, and in doing so, he makes the most private motive into a public argument about who gets to define reverence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Andres
Add to List


