"Narrative identity takes part in the story's movement, in the dialectic between order and disorder"
About this Quote
Ricoeur is quietly detonating the fantasy that the self is a stable object you can inventory and secure. “Narrative identity” isn’t a personal brand or an inner essence; it’s something that happens in time, under pressure, the way a plot happens. By saying it “takes part in the story’s movement,” he frames identity as participatory and provisional: you don’t simply possess a story, you’re recruited by it, revised by it, and sometimes blindsided by it.
The crucial engine here is the “dialectic between order and disorder.” Ricoeur is writing in the late 20th-century shadow of structuralism and post-structuralism, when thinkers were battling over whether meaning is imposed by systems (order) or dissolved by contingency and difference (disorder). His move is to refuse both extremes. The self is neither a neat narrative with a moral stapled to the end, nor a pile of disconnected episodes. Identity emerges in the negotiation: we stitch coherence out of ruptures, then those stitches get tested by new events, trauma, politics, and other people’s stories colliding with ours.
Subtext: he’s also reframing ethics. If identity is narratively composed, responsibility isn’t just about what you “are,” but about how you interpret and re-interpret your actions across time - how you make them hang together without lying about the chaos. The intent is less self-help than epistemic humility: the most honest account of a life admits both the need for order and the stubborn fact of disorder, and treats identity as the ongoing labor of making meaning without pretending the plot was ever fully under control.
The crucial engine here is the “dialectic between order and disorder.” Ricoeur is writing in the late 20th-century shadow of structuralism and post-structuralism, when thinkers were battling over whether meaning is imposed by systems (order) or dissolved by contingency and difference (disorder). His move is to refuse both extremes. The self is neither a neat narrative with a moral stapled to the end, nor a pile of disconnected episodes. Identity emerges in the negotiation: we stitch coherence out of ruptures, then those stitches get tested by new events, trauma, politics, and other people’s stories colliding with ours.
Subtext: he’s also reframing ethics. If identity is narratively composed, responsibility isn’t just about what you “are,” but about how you interpret and re-interpret your actions across time - how you make them hang together without lying about the chaos. The intent is less self-help than epistemic humility: the most honest account of a life admits both the need for order and the stubborn fact of disorder, and treats identity as the ongoing labor of making meaning without pretending the plot was ever fully under control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List


