"Natural ability without education has more often attained to glory and virtue than education without natural ability"
About this Quote
Cicero draws a line between innate talent and formal schooling, arguing that raw ability, guided by character, more often reaches the peaks of glory and virtue than education that lacks natural endowment. In Roman terms, gloria and virtus are not mere fame and private morality; they are public recognition of excellence and a civic ethic of courage, justice, and service. Glory without noble character was suspect, and virtue that never entered public life was incomplete.
He writes as a statesman and orator who wrestled with the recipe for eloquence and leadership. For Cicero, three elements make the orator: natura (ingenium), exercitatio (practice), and doctrina (art and education). He grants a primacy to nature, not to belittle learning but to insist that instruction without the spark of genius or the moral fiber to channel it produces polish without power. Roman culture celebrated self-made vigor: figures like Cato the Elder or Gaius Marius, who owed less to Greek schooling than to force of character, became exemplars of virtus. Yet aristocratic Rome also prized Greek paideia, and Cicero himself absorbed philosophy and rhetoric deeply. The line therefore offers not anti-intellectualism but a corrective: schooling cannot fabricate soul.
To reach public excellence, talent must be oriented to the good. Education can impart techniques, doctrines, and historical examples, but if the student lacks imagination, judgment, courage, and a native ear for language and people, schooling yields sterile pedantry or cunning without moral weight. By contrast, uneducated but gifted individuals can, through practice, observation, and civic trial, align their natural force with communal ideals and achieve deeds the schools only describe.
The claim also warns against complacency, which Cicero would resist. Nature without discipline can turn into recklessness, while education refines, steadies, and universalizes talent. The ideal remains the harmony of nature and training, but when forced to choose which more often carries a person to public honor and moral excellence, he wagers on innate capacity joined to character.
He writes as a statesman and orator who wrestled with the recipe for eloquence and leadership. For Cicero, three elements make the orator: natura (ingenium), exercitatio (practice), and doctrina (art and education). He grants a primacy to nature, not to belittle learning but to insist that instruction without the spark of genius or the moral fiber to channel it produces polish without power. Roman culture celebrated self-made vigor: figures like Cato the Elder or Gaius Marius, who owed less to Greek schooling than to force of character, became exemplars of virtus. Yet aristocratic Rome also prized Greek paideia, and Cicero himself absorbed philosophy and rhetoric deeply. The line therefore offers not anti-intellectualism but a corrective: schooling cannot fabricate soul.
To reach public excellence, talent must be oriented to the good. Education can impart techniques, doctrines, and historical examples, but if the student lacks imagination, judgment, courage, and a native ear for language and people, schooling yields sterile pedantry or cunning without moral weight. By contrast, uneducated but gifted individuals can, through practice, observation, and civic trial, align their natural force with communal ideals and achieve deeds the schools only describe.
The claim also warns against complacency, which Cicero would resist. Nature without discipline can turn into recklessness, while education refines, steadies, and universalizes talent. The ideal remains the harmony of nature and training, but when forced to choose which more often carries a person to public honor and moral excellence, he wagers on innate capacity joined to character.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Cicero
Add to List
