"Natural selection is not evolution"
About this Quote
A mathematician’s curtness is doing real rhetorical work here: Fisher is warning you not to confuse a mechanism with a history. “Natural selection” names a rule-like process - differential survival and reproduction. “Evolution” is the full accounting ledger: the long-term change in populations, the branching of lineages, the accumulation (and loss) of traits, the messy contingencies of ecology and chance. By separating the two, Fisher is policing sloppy thinking that treats selection as a synonym for “whatever makes organisms change over time.”
The subtext is disciplinary turf and intellectual hygiene. Fisher helped fuse Mendelian genetics with Darwin’s insight, translating biology into equations and probabilities. In that project, selection becomes one term in a larger model alongside mutation, recombination, migration, and genetic drift. His line pushes back against both popular Darwinism (which can drift into “selection explains everything”) and critics who attack “evolution” by aiming at a caricatured version of selection. He’s saying: you can accept evolution without assuming every feature is a selection story; you can model selection without pretending it exhausts evolutionary causation.
Context matters: early 20th-century evolutionary theory was still digesting genetics, arguing about whether gradual selection could account for observed patterns, and wrestling with what counts as explanation in biology. Fisher’s aphorism is a miniature manifesto for precision: don’t let a single elegant principle become a totalizing worldview. In science, the cleanest equation is rarely the whole organism.
The subtext is disciplinary turf and intellectual hygiene. Fisher helped fuse Mendelian genetics with Darwin’s insight, translating biology into equations and probabilities. In that project, selection becomes one term in a larger model alongside mutation, recombination, migration, and genetic drift. His line pushes back against both popular Darwinism (which can drift into “selection explains everything”) and critics who attack “evolution” by aiming at a caricatured version of selection. He’s saying: you can accept evolution without assuming every feature is a selection story; you can model selection without pretending it exhausts evolutionary causation.
Context matters: early 20th-century evolutionary theory was still digesting genetics, arguing about whether gradual selection could account for observed patterns, and wrestling with what counts as explanation in biology. Fisher’s aphorism is a miniature manifesto for precision: don’t let a single elegant principle become a totalizing worldview. In science, the cleanest equation is rarely the whole organism.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ronald
Add to List


