"Nature has no principles. She makes no distinction between good and evil"
About this Quote
Anatole France lands the line like a velvet-gloved slap at Victorian moral certainty: nature, he suggests, is not a tribunal. She is mechanism, appetite, weather, reproduction, rot. By casting nature as "she" and then stripping her of "principles", he exploits a familiar sentimental trope - Mother Nature as wise, benevolent guardian - only to revoke it. The personification is bait; the punchline is indifference.
The specific intent is to sever ethics from biology. France is warning against a common rhetorical cheat: treating what is "natural" as what is "good". If nature does not distinguish good from evil, then appeals to nature cannot settle arguments about justice, cruelty, sexuality, hierarchy, or survival. Predation is natural. So is care. So is disease. "Natural" is a description, not a permission slip.
The subtext carries a sly anti-clerical edge. In a culture that often smuggled providence into the landscape - the idea that the world is built to reward virtue and punish sin - France insists on a cosmos that does not collaborate with our moral narratives. That refusal can read as bleak, but it is also clarifying: if nature won't underwrite our values, responsibility boomerangs back to human institutions.
Context matters: France writes in an era marinated in Darwin's aftershocks and the opportunistic misreadings of evolution into social Darwinism. His line functions as both an acknowledgment of nature's amoral facts and a rebuke to anyone trying to launder brutality through "nature's law". If there is good and evil here, it's ours to define, defend, and enforce - without pretending the forest agrees.
The specific intent is to sever ethics from biology. France is warning against a common rhetorical cheat: treating what is "natural" as what is "good". If nature does not distinguish good from evil, then appeals to nature cannot settle arguments about justice, cruelty, sexuality, hierarchy, or survival. Predation is natural. So is care. So is disease. "Natural" is a description, not a permission slip.
The subtext carries a sly anti-clerical edge. In a culture that often smuggled providence into the landscape - the idea that the world is built to reward virtue and punish sin - France insists on a cosmos that does not collaborate with our moral narratives. That refusal can read as bleak, but it is also clarifying: if nature won't underwrite our values, responsibility boomerangs back to human institutions.
Context matters: France writes in an era marinated in Darwin's aftershocks and the opportunistic misreadings of evolution into social Darwinism. His line functions as both an acknowledgment of nature's amoral facts and a rebuke to anyone trying to launder brutality through "nature's law". If there is good and evil here, it's ours to define, defend, and enforce - without pretending the forest agrees.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Anatole
Add to List









