"Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites"
About this Quote
That second clause is where the moral and legal imagination lives. “Appetites” isn’t just consumption; it’s entitlement, the cultural habit of assuming growth is nonnegotiable and consequences are externalities. Ruckelshaus’s legal background matters here: he’s translating ecology into governance. Nature’s “free lunch” is really a common resource, and common resources only stay “free” when rules, restraint, and enforcement prevent the classic tragedy of everyone grabbing seconds. The quote’s subtext is that environmental collapse isn’t a mystery of science; it’s a failure of self-regulation and public regulation.
Contextually, Ruckelshaus spent a career watching environmental policy collide with short-term economic incentives. The sentence is built like a warning label: you can have prosperity that feels effortless, but only if you accept limits. It’s a compact argument for sustainability that refuses both naive optimism (nature will absorb anything) and nihilism (nothing can be done). The “free lunch” exists, but not for gluttons.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Ruckelshaus, William. (2026, January 16). Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nature-provides-a-free-lunch-but-only-if-we-132615/
Chicago Style
Ruckelshaus, William. "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nature-provides-a-free-lunch-but-only-if-we-132615/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/nature-provides-a-free-lunch-but-only-if-we-132615/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.





