"Need we add that mathematicians themselves are not infallible?"
About this Quote
The rhetorical move is slyly modern. "Need we add..". feigns inevitability, as if any reasonable adult already knows this. That faux modesty is the point. It turns the reader into a co-conspirator against the kind of reverence that treats proofs as scripture and mathematicians as priests. Poincare, a major figure in the late-19th/early-20th-century struggle to formalize math and grapple with its foundations, was writing in an era when confidence in scientific objectivity was both soaring and starting to crack. Paradoxes and foundational disputes were beginning to show that rigor isn't just a moral virtue; it's a negotiated practice.
The subtext is also institutional: errors survive because communities let them. Mathematicians can be wrong, but they can also be collectively wrong for a while, protected by prestige, fashion, or the sheer difficulty of checking work. Poincare hints at a healthier picture of knowledge: not an oracle but a system with error-correction, where certainty is earned socially through verification, not granted by title. It's humility deployed as quality control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Poincare, Henri. (2026, January 14). Need we add that mathematicians themselves are not infallible? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/need-we-add-that-mathematicians-themselves-are-23053/
Chicago Style
Poincare, Henri. "Need we add that mathematicians themselves are not infallible?" FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/need-we-add-that-mathematicians-themselves-are-23053/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Need we add that mathematicians themselves are not infallible?" FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/need-we-add-that-mathematicians-themselves-are-23053/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





