"Nevertheless, this one fact should be apparent: turning the other cheek is a bribe. It is a valid form of action for only so long as the Christian is impotent politically or militarily"
About this Quote
Gary North’s line isn’t trying to rescue the Sermon on the Mount from sentimentality; it’s trying to repossess it for power politics. By calling “turning the other cheek” a “bribe,” he drags a famous moral instruction out of the realm of conscience and into the marketplace of leverage. A bribe isn’t virtue; it’s a transaction: I absorb the insult now so you’ll stop, soften, or underestimate me. The provocation is deliberate. He wants the reader to feel the whiplash of seeing Christian forbearance described in the cold language of payoff and strategy.
The subtext is a critique of pacifism that doubles as an argument about who gets to define “Christian action.” North implies that nonviolence is not a timeless ethic but a tactic used by the weak until they can afford coercion. That second clause - “only so long as the Christian is impotent politically or militarily” - is the tell. It reframes humility as a temporary posture adopted under constraint, not a binding commitment. In this reading, ethics track capability: once Christians have the state, the vote, the army, the police, the cheek stops turning.
Contextually, this sits comfortably inside a strain of late-20th-century Christian political thought that treats religion as a governing program rather than a private devotion. It’s rhetorical jujitsu aimed at believers who suspect they’ve been asked to lose politely. North offers them a harder bargain: abandon the idea that restraint is holiness, and you can call domination “responsibility” when you finally have the means.
The subtext is a critique of pacifism that doubles as an argument about who gets to define “Christian action.” North implies that nonviolence is not a timeless ethic but a tactic used by the weak until they can afford coercion. That second clause - “only so long as the Christian is impotent politically or militarily” - is the tell. It reframes humility as a temporary posture adopted under constraint, not a binding commitment. In this reading, ethics track capability: once Christians have the state, the vote, the army, the police, the cheek stops turning.
Contextually, this sits comfortably inside a strain of late-20th-century Christian political thought that treats religion as a governing program rather than a private devotion. It’s rhetorical jujitsu aimed at believers who suspect they’ve been asked to lose politely. North offers them a harder bargain: abandon the idea that restraint is holiness, and you can call domination “responsibility” when you finally have the means.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Gary
Add to List







